<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Banking theories in the United States before 1860</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Harry Edward</forname>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1755492553</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>BANKING POLICY 
175 
always provided with the means of instantly redeeming them 
when presented; hence, it is as important that the capital, which 
ought to furnish those means, should be frequently returned to 
it as that it should be profitably employed.” ! 
More interesting than the discussion of the proper length of 
loans * was the consideration given to the problem of the relative 
merits of advances made against accommodation paper as com- 
pared with discounts of paper representing trade transactions. 
To a considerable degree the two problems cannot be separated. 
Those who insisted upon the superiority of real paper as the basis 
for loans were usually equally anxious that loans should be for 
short periods and not subject to renewal; while an analogous 
connection can be shown between defenders of accommodation 
loans and of loans of longer maturity. 
Smith had urged that discounts based upon real paper cannot 
give rise to an unhealthy issue of bank notes? and the matter still 
remained a moot question in England. In this country, Bollman 
in 1816 advanced the thesis that real loans admit of no over- 
extension of credit,’ and in the second quarter of the century it 
became a popular one. Cooper, to take a typical example, thought 
that the amount of bank notes in circulation would vary exactly 
with the wants of commerce,’ if the policy of making none but 
real loans were adhered to. Accommodation loans disturbed the 
equilibrium, and, further, led to extravagance and bankruptcy. 
Tucker summarized the case for real, or “business paper,” as it 
was often called, by saying that loans of which it formed the basis 
were self-liquidating (to use a present-day term), encouraged 
industry and commerce without furnishing the means and incen- 
t C. F. Adams, “Principles of Credit,” Hunt's Merchants’ Magazine (March, 
1840), ii, 197. 
* Call loans received an interesting analysis, but it was principally with reference 
to their bearing upon commercial crises and it will be treated in that connection. 
See the last chapter. 
¥ Wealth of Nations, book II, chap. 2 (vol. i, p. 287). 
! Bollman, Plan for an Improved System (1818), p. 15. 
5 In all but a few cases a currency varying with the needs of trade was taken to 
mean one varying exactly as it would if wholly metallic. See supra, Chapter VII. 
8 Cooper, Lectures (1826), pp. 133-143.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
