<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>International trade</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Frank William</forname>
            <surname>Taussig</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1758394757</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>VARYING ADVANTAGES 
Te par 
AEE 
91 
American wheat were exchanged for German cloth at any figure 
between 18 and 10 of cloth against 10 of wheat. Suppose the barter 
terms of trade to be advantageous to the United States; that by 
sending 10 wheat to Germany she gets 15 of cloth. In Germany 
15 of cloth are produced with the same labor as 121 of linen 
(18:15::15:123), and it is immaterial to Germany whether she 
gives 15 of cloth or 12% of linen for the 10 of wheat. The United 
States gains by either act of exchange: if she gets 15 of cloth for 
10 of wheat, she gains 5 of cloth; and if she gets 121 of linen for 10 
of wheat, she gains 2% of linen. That particular combination or 
proportioning of the commodities (15 of German cloth and 12% of 
German linen for every 20 of American wheat) may precisely suit 
the mutual tastes or demands. Both countries will then gain if not 
cloth only, but linen also, moves from Germany to the United 
States. 
II. Take now a situation toward the other extreme, one in which 
the barter terms of trade are favorable not to the United States but 
to Germany. Suppose the United States gets in exchange for 10 of 
wheat no more than 11 of cloth; the United States thus gaining 
from the operation only 1 of cloth. In Germany 11 of cloth are 
produced with the same labor as 9% of linen (18:15:: 11 : 9%), and 
the American wheat, which exchanges for 11 of cloth, would 
exchange at German rates for only 9% of linen. Obviously the 
Americans get more linen (10) for their 10 days of labor by pro- 
ducing it directly than by procuring it from Germany. But more. 
The United States now not only will find it worth while to produce 
her own linen; she will gain by exporting it to Germany and 
taking cloth in exchange. It is immaterial to the United States 
whether she sends 10 of wheat or 10 of linen to Germany — both 
are produced with the same labor. Within Germany, however, 
12 of cloth exchange for 10 of linen, and therefore 11 of cloth 
exchange for 9% linen. The United States by sending 9% linen to 
Germany can get 11 of cloth in exchange. This particular combi- 
nation or proportioning of commodities (10 of American wheat 
together with 9% of American linen in exchange for every 22 of 
German cloth) may again precisely suit the conditions of mutual</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
