<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>International trade</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Frank William</forname>
            <surname>Taussig</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1758394757</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>388 CIN TERNATIONAL TRADE

r
|]

may be divergence, and thus an effect either way on imports and
exports.
Which of the two possible results will be found when paper
issues are first put out, or when paper is in the first stage of added
issue, will depend on the way the purchasing power is used. When
a government resorts to paper, it does not scatter the money broadcast,
 as might be inferred from the way in which we often speak of
the “issue” of paper money. The money Is spent; it is applied
to the purchase of goods or services. The effect on prices is first
felt on the things for which the government bids. These may happen
 to be services and domestic goods; and then there will be no
proximate effect on other domestic goods and services than those
bought by the government, and none on imported or exported
goods; hence no immediate change in the currents of international
trade. As time goes on, the tendency to rising prices spreads in all
directions. Those who sold the goods or services to the government
 have larger money incomes; they spend more, and the prices
of other goods go up. I see no ground for supposing that under
conditions of this kind there will be any special advance in the prices
of either imported or exported goods; there will be nothing in the
nature of a bounty either way. So far as concerns international
trade, the case will be neutral.
If, however, the government — or the other persons first getting
command of the paper money — uses its additional purchasing
power for buying imported goods, or for making remittances to
foreigners on other than merchandise account, the bounty on
exports will arise. These purchases enter the market for foreign
exchange, and the exchange rate rises on countries to which
remittances are to be made. It rises more than prices of goods
made at home, if indeed these rise in the first instance at all.
The exporter who has exchange on foreign countries to sell makes an
extra profit. He can sell his exchange (in Germany, say) at a
higher price, while his expenses for the moment are no greater.
As has just been said, the added margin of profit will doubtless be
shared between him and the various middlemen. If exchange
rises fast and far, if the margin of profit is great, there will be</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
