<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Origin, birthplace, nationality and language of the Canadian people</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1794974814</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>178 RELATION OF ORIGINS AND NATIVITY TO CRIME
It is seen that the rate for the British immigrants is larger by half than that for the
Canadian born, and the proportion convicted among those of foreign birth is two and a half
times greater. The problem is to determine how much of these differences is due to sex
and age distribution especially favourable to crime.
In an appendix to this Chapter, the method of making corrections for age and sex
distribution in the different nativity groups and the actual calculations are given in detail,
and those who may be interested in the mathematics of the problem are referred thereto.
The rate was computed for each nativity group on the basis of the rates for Canada as a
whole as given in Table 108; allowances were made for the extent to which the age and sex
distribution of the three nativity groups differed from that of the total population of the
Dominion in 1921. In other words, a uniform crime rate was assumed in all classes of the
population, and rates were computed for the Canadian, ‘ Other British’ and Foreign born,
which take into account merely differences in age and sex distribution. The rates so
computed were expressed as percentages of the rate for those of Canadian birth, and the
differences appearing are due entirely to age and sex. The results appear below, together
with the crude rates quoted below: —

TABLE 109. —ACTUAL NUMBER OF CONVICTIONS FOR INDICTABLE OFFENCES IN CANADA IN 1921
BY BROAD NATIVITY GROUPS AND THE RATES PER 100,000 POPULATION OF EACH GROUP.

Birthplace

CaNAdA. Lotter e rere aaas
Other British countries.............o 4 veveie anne. A
Foreign COUNtrien. ..ovveerverreieriirinnreeneerernnnnns « way wp oes
NOL ZEVOI. te treirrnerennsrenrnsnesosen er oon

Number of
onvictions

10, 638
~,50¢
4,624
. 625

Rate per
100,000 of
each group

156
236
408

Rate with
Canadian-born
taken as 100

100
151
2682

TABLE 110—COMPARATIVE RATES OF CRIMINALITY AMONG THE CANADIAN-BORN, BRITISH-BORN
 AND FOREIGN-BORN POPULATIONS OF CANADA, WITH THE BIAS DUE TO DIP.
FERING AGE AND SEX DISTRIBUTIONS OF THESE POPULATIONS REMOVED.
Nore.—Rates among the Canadian-born population = 100 in each case.

Birthplace

CANAUB. .,.-eeeeern serene eeeen eee eee
Bhar BRIG. vvinsenis + inness anestis in iin memsmmmmmmoon un
BOT DOIN. a iee ieee seit tere reese rennin

\iJ
Expected rates of
convictions on the
basis of uniform
criminality in each
group, and of the
existing age and sex
distribution of each
groun.

100
1556
172

(2)

Actual rates
convictions
in 1921

100
151
262

oo. 8)
Ratio of actual convictions
 to expected
convictions, indicating
 real difference
 in criminality
apart from age and
sex distribution of
population.
(Col. 2 + Col. 1).

100
98
152

On the basis of the number of indictable convictions per 100,000 of each age and
sex group as shown in Table 108 above, the ‘ Other British’ born would have shown a rate
55 p.c. greater than the Canadian born and the Foreign born a rate 72 p-c. greater, merely
because of larger proportions of young men in the prime of life and smaller percentages of
women and children. The proportion by which the actual rate for the ‘Other British’
exceeded that for the Canadian born was 51 p.c., which indicates that the whole difference
between the crude rates for the Canadian and ‘ Other British’ born may be accounted for
on the basis of age and sex distribution. The same does not hold for the foreign born.
The actual rate exceeded that for the Canadian born by 162 p.c., and only 72 p.c. of that
excess is attributable to an age and sex distribution more favourable to crime. The conclusion
obviously is that, in so far as convictions for indictable offences are an index of criminality,
lisregard for the law among the foreign born is some 152 pe. (i.e 282) of what it is among
the Canadian born, and that after due allowances are made for differences of age and sex
distribution. It is shown in the appendix that the difference is probably greater than the
index sugeests.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
