38 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS 
TABLE 18.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, 
of producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested 
IDAHO, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR THE TWO AREAS INVESTIGATED 
[Excluding capital charges] 
Cost per ton 
Less than— 
Me ece———— 
Na. 
Farms 
Number | Per cent 
0.9 
10.4 
15.1 
it 
421 
Acres 
Number | Per cent 
20.8 
134.3 
202.9 
488. 4 
661. 6 
R71.( 
228. 
4, 
11.1 
16.8 
40. 5 
54.8 
Number | 
000. U 
2, 5562. 1 
3,831.1 
8,285.9 
10, 931. 6 
Cc. I81.¢ 
921.4 
350. 
699.” 
048. . 
209. 4 
28. 
i. . 
Tons 
Per cent 
21 
14.4 
21.7 
46.9 
61.9 
76.9 
78.8 
ag 9 
Q 
06. 5 
97.4 
98.1 
99.1 
99. 6 
99.9 
100.0 
TaBLE 19.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, 
of producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested 
IDAHO, 1922—~COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR THE TWO AREAS INVESTIGATED 
[Including capital charges] 
[Land charge on net cash rental basis with interest on other capital at 6 per cent} 
Cost per ton 
Less than— 
34,00. ce ieemecem—ee meee 
* TTY co te re em re 0 
10 
“n 
Farms 
Number | Per cent | 
? 
1 
1¢ 
33 
0.¢ 
1 
11.* 
17.9 
31.1 
A 
3 
0 
nN 
105 
106 
Gy 
99. 
100. 0 
Acres 
Number | Per cent 
20.8 
24.8 
146. 3 
242, 9 
134. 9 
6.8.6 
nee 
36.0. 1 
970. & 
: 
L 
2.1 
12.1 
20.1 
36.0 
51.2 
Number 
366. 0 
442.0 
2,808. 1 
4,476. 
7,593. 1 
0, 349, i 
~08. ¢ 
46. & 
“0. 
3.1 
).¢ 
6 
x 
Tons 
Per cent 
2.1 
2.5 
15.9 
25.3 
43.0 
58. 6 
65. 7 
78.4 
84.7 
86. 7 
91.7 
94.7 
97.6 
08.1 
08.3 
98.8 
99.1 
99.4 
99.9 
100 0