64 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS TABLE 31.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested UTAH, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 478 FARMS IN THE THREE AREAS INVESTIGATED [Excluding capital charges] Cost per ton aeg than— B00. ice cm mm me Bm AO eee 1 ee mm ccmmmm—en oe. r ¢ vo ll bee 290.01 Farms Number | Per cent | 2 19 59 1: 0.4 4.0 12.3 23.6 | 35.4 50.8 52.1 I 2%" - Acres Number Per cent 20.0 282.0 1,004. 5 1,948.1 2,853. 6 », 799. 4 545.4 06. 4 08.4 0.4 4.2 16.3 29.0 42.5 | RR, 6 7.7 ~.0 3.8 “3.1 1.3 4 9 0.7 7 dav Tons Number | Per cent 466.0 4, 577.8 16,393. 4 29,740. 6 42,112. 2 55,393. 5 23,002. 7 1,713.2 77,921.4 10,908. 1 "7 875. 4, 711. £ 5, 657. & 4,072.4 ’, 705. 2 850. 2 010.1 247. § 348. F 425.4 614.8 714. 1 764. } "90. € 6.1 R7. 848. 1 0.5 5.2 18.7 33.8 47.9 63.1 74.0 81.6 88.7 22.1 04.3 96.4 97.5 £0 “8.% "9 9.1 0a. 2 09.4 99.5 99." $9. . 99.9 99.9 99.9 100. © TasLE 32.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested UTAH, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 478 FARMS IN THE THREE AREAS INVESTIGATED {Land charges on net cash rental basis and interest on other capital at 6 per cent] [Including capital charges] Cost per ton Less tr>n— A. Yemen mmmremmmmnn mmm oo. i Ee ee re ef. ro. ms 6 oe I Number ' Per cent 1 ¢ 20 4¢ ~ 14° 201 250 +3 0.2 .6 4.2 10.0 I> coy ge. 90 99.4 09. 6 99. § 100. ¢ 47 4 478 Acres Number Per cent | 32.0 54.0 212.0 333.5 £98. 5 AT 0.8 .& R.2 12.4 ee 30.5 5 "05.3 6,708.3 6.716. 3 5. 59. ¢ 09, ¢ 100. f Tons Number Per cent 384.0 717.0 3,704.4 i2, 803.0 "4, 651. § 3, 671.1 12,163. ( 408.7 30.6 76.4 09, ¢ 929. ¢ . 458.4 357. ,699. = 770." "289. 254. 487." £44 14 0.4 .8 4.2 14.6 28.1 41.7 54.8 64. 2 73 1 82.8 87.9 91.0 93.0 04.9 96 4 97.6 rc dA 08. 08.9 99.1 99, 2 or 7 £7 ¢. 9g. 99.9 100.0 100. 0 J2. 5. L532. 764. 37,790. 1 37, 812. 4 37 848. 1