656 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS 
TaBLE 33.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of 
producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested 
IDAHO, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 106 FARMS IN THE TWO 
AREAS INVESTIGATED 
[Excluding capital charges] 
Cost per ton 
Less than— 
BE Mone mune ~marrmesecwnonsy 
Ce. I 
) ee emcee aan 
Domeaeen meme 
Fripmngmmmns mee 
i 
8 
BL 
$1. 
3: 
$15.0 
$18.50 
Farms 
Number | Per cent | 
4 
Lu 
16 
0.9 
10.4 
15.1 
24.9 
48,1 
FL 
; 
1. 
Acres 
Number | Per cent 
20. 8 
134.3 
202.9 
488.4 
661. 6 
871.6 
796.1 
1604.8 
1.7 
11.1 
16.8 
40.5 
54.8 
2.2 
Cd 
i, 
{,207.3 
Number | Per cent 
366.0 
9, 552. 1 
3,831.1 
8 285. 9 
0,931.6 
I F81.0 
© 021.4 
750.7 
699. « 
“48.4 
ab 
2.1 
14.4 
21.7 
46. 9 
61. 9 
76.9 
78.8 
°5,9 
88.9 
96. 5 
97.4 
98.1 
99.1 
99.6 
99.9 
100. 0 
Li, 66D. 0 
TABLE 34.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of 
producing farms and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested 
IDAHO, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 106 FARMS IN THE TWO 
AREAS INVESTIGATED 
[Land charges on net cash rental basis and interest on other capital at 6 per cent] 
[Including capital charges] 
Cost per ton 
Less than— 
$4.09. 
$M.) oo 
$d. 
$5.7). 
Foy 
Lemmons 
LI 
“n 
. 4. 
816. 
"90. 
arms 
Number | Pereoat | 
1 
2 
12 
19 
33 
ie 
0.9 
L9 
11.3 
17.9 
Ti, ! 
13. 
0 
L 
7, 
go! 
’: 4 
C 
Nn 
1 
2 
03 
05 
{068 
¢ “ 
97.2 
99.1 
100. G 
Number 
20.8 
24.8 
146.3 
242.9 
134.9 
518. 6 
708. 6 
"9,1 
370. 8 
(3.8 
“74,8 
192.8 
87. 4 
4 
ig 
hl 
,195. 5 
1, 206. 2 
1,207.2 
Acres 
Per cent 
1.7 
2.1 
12.1 
20.7 
*G.f 
3. 
So. 
99.0 
99.9 
100. 0 
Tons 
Number | Per cent 
366.0 
442.0 
2,808.1 
4,476.2 
7,593.1 
.0,349.1 
"1, 608. € 
> 846. ° 
962. ¢ 
793.1 
1190.9 
if 125.6 
"45.9 
1,928.4 
1.2641 
1,448, 
34,507. 1 
17, 562, 1 
17,653.0 
17. 665. 8 
2.1 
2.5 
16.9 
25.3 
43.0 
58. 6 
65.7 
8. 
‘4 
°f. * 
1.7 
94.7 
07.6 
98.1 
98.3 
98.8 
99.1 
99. 4 
99. 9 
100. 0