<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The agrarian system of Moslem India</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>William Harrison</forname>
            <surname>Moreland</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1804119261</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>152 THE AGRARIAN SYSTEM OF MOSLEM INDIA 
The flight of peasants from the land to more attractive 
occupations, which was considered in the last section, 
undoubtedly continued, and was probably intensified, 
during the reign of Aurangzeb; and when peasants decreased, 
the assignees’ Income was necessarily reduced. We may 
indeed reasonably infer that the process, once started, was 
apt to be cumulative, because an assignee, with a short and 
uncertain tenure, would ordinarily try to make good some 
part of his loss by increased pressure on the peasants who 
remained at work, and increased pressure would in turn 
strengthen the motives which tempted peasants to abscond. 
A progressive decline in the Income yielded by Assignments 
would of itself explain their unpopularity, but in addition 
there was the risk that the assignee might not be able to 
obtain possession even of what remained. 
So far as the Deccan is concerned, this risk arose pri- 
marily from the activities of the Mardthas. The story of 
Aurangzeb’s attempt to maintain his position in the South 
can be read elsewhere, and it must suffice to recall the fact 
that the Marithas steadily extended both their settled 
dominions and their claim to share in the yield of a much 
larger area. A passage in Khwiafi Khan (ii. 484 ff.) shows 
that within ten years of Aurangzeb’s death this claim, 
which in form amounted to one-fourth (chauth) of the 
revenue, had in practice risen to nearly one-half; while 
in villages which had been restored after depopulation, the 
gross produce was divided equally between the Marithas, 
the assignees, and the peasants. Thus an assignee could 
not hope to realise anything like the share of half the 
produce, which had formerly represented his Income; and 
it must always have been doubtful if he would be allowed 
to realise anything at all in the areas where the Marathas 
maintained their separate staff of revenue-collectors. It is 
easy then to understand that a cash-order, even on an almost 
empty treasury, would have been preferred to an Assignment 
in the region dominated by the Marithas. 
As regards Northern India, our information is very incom- 
plete, for the chronicles tell us little of what was happening 
in the North after the year 1682, when Aurangzeb trans- 
ferred his Court to the Deccan. All that can be said is that</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
