™ PONTIFICIAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARVM SCRIPTA VARIA - 28 logy, history and economics so as to be mainly of a nonexperimeatal kind, It is very true that experiments also belong in the picture, but that was just to simplify. To comment more in detail on the question about meteorology, [ would say that while most of the fundamental law of physics can be demonstrated by controlled experiments, the empirical evidence on the thermodynamic theory of cyclones is essentially nonexperi- mental — you do not experiment with cyclones on a world global scale, and the same holds true of many other meteorological appli- cations of physics. At the same time there are elements of genuine controlled experiments in meteorology — rainmaking devices are a case in point. The experiments of rainmaking provide material for model building at the descriptive and explanatory as well as the forecasting level, showing that experimental and nonexperimental evidence combine and merge at all levels of model building, including the level of forecasting. FRISCH I want to congratulate both Prof. STONE and Prof. MAHALANOBIS for their presentations, I am very much in agreement about what they say about the philosophy of models and as a matter of fact they have relieved me of a good portion of my own task when I am going to speak in a few days from now. Of course I also agree completely to the three points which Prof. Worp put before us — the three levels of aspiration so to speak, but — and this is so- mething which I took down while he was talking — there is a fourth point which must absolutely be added (and here of course I am talking in the same vein as Prof. MAHALANOBIS) namely the analysis of the decision on action. What are we going to do? That of course depends on what we would like to see happen sometime in the future and as a matter of fact this will really be a very essential point in my presentation, This is the essence of the distinction between a forecasting model and a decision model. I understand that Pro- "1] Stone - pag. 98