<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Study week on the econometric approach to development planning</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1824422792</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>112 PONTIFICIAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARVM SCRIPTA VARIA - 28 
In consequence, great difficulties began to be experienced 
from the early years of the First Plan. Practically all the estim- 
ates for investments had been made in purely financial terms 
and a sizable increase in investments had been approved purely 
on a financial basis. As soon as the investment projects began 
to be implemented, there was a sharp and continuing increase 
in the requirements of steel and other goods and services. 
Very soon the demand for cement increased to nearly three 
times the domestic supply. There was also a continuing and 
large expenditure of foreign currency for the import of steel, 
which added up to something like 2,000 million dollars in 
the next ten years or so. In 1050 it would have been possible 
to establish a new million ton steel plant with perhaps about 
150 million dollars of imported machinery. Had this project 
deen started at that time an additional supply of one million 
ton of steel (worth more than one hundred million dollars per 
year) would have been available from the early years of the 
Second Fide Year Plan, and would have resulted in a very 
large and continuing saving of foreign exchange. The deci- 
sion to drop the million ton steel project from the First Plan 
was due to attention being focussed only on the current demand 
in 1949, that is, due to a complete failure to appreciate the 
need of looking ahead to get ready to meet the demand for 
steel which was certain to increase rapidly in future. 
Targets of steel in 1970: At heavy cost we had learnt the 
lesson of not proceeding with the building up of capacity for 
steel production 12 or 15 years ago. Much attention is now 
oeing given to advance planning for steel. A detailed analysis 
of the requirements of steel is made, where possible, by indi- 
vidual items of production. With a given set of production 
targets for, say, 1970, it is possible in this way to prepare 
useful estimates of the requireménts of steel. Some illustrative 
figures for the transport equipment industry is given in the 
following table. 
‘151 Mahalanobis I] - pag: 10</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
