860 - SECRETARIAL PRACTICE PAGE Birkett v. Cowper-Coles (1919), 35 T.L. R. 298. ............. 69 Bisgood v. Henderson’s Transvaal Estates (1908), 1 Ch. 793; 77 L. J. Ch. 486; 98 L. T. 809; 24 T. L. R. 510; 52 S. J. 412; 15 Mans. 163.................. 215, 219, 220, 221 Bishop v. Balkis Co. (1890), 25 Q.B.D. 512; 59 L. J. Q.B. 565; B3L. TT. 600; 30 W.R. 08. covsnsnuncsssnisnobun ene 72 Blair Open Hearth Furnace Co., Re. (1914), 1 Ch. 390; 83L. J. Ch. 313; 109 L. T. 839; 21 Mans. 49........covueun.. 48 Blair Open Hearth v. Reigart (1913), 108 L. T. 665; 57 S. J. 500; 29 T.L. R. 449....... FEMBE PERE 138 Blaker v. Herts. & Essex Waterworks Co. (1889) 41 Ch. D. 399 196 Bloomenthal v. Ford (1897), A.C. 156; 66 L. J. Ch. 253; 76 L. T. 205; 45 W. R. 449...... Cee eee 42 Bodega Co., Re (1904), 1 Ch. 276; 73 L. J. Ch. 198; 89 L. T. 694; 52 W. R. 249; 11 Mans. 95. ........c......... 147, 148 Bolton & Co., Re, Salisbury Jones’ Case (1894), 3 Ch. 356; 64 L. J. Ch. 27; 71 L. T. 284; 1 Mans. 431; 7 R. 504 Bombay Burma Corporation v. Dorabji (1905), A.C. 213; 74L.J.P.C.41;91L.T. 812; 12 Mans. 169; 21 T.L. R. Bond v. Barrow Hematite Co. (1902), 1 Ch. 353; 71 L. J. Ch. 246; 86 L. T. 10; 50 W. R. 295; 9 Mans. 69; 1I8T.L. R. 249....... Ce eee ec ceeeaee Borax Co., Re (1901), 1 Ch. 326; 70 L. J. Ch. 162; 83 L. T. 638; 49 W.R. 212; 17 T.L.R. 1590. ......cnvn.nn. Borland’s Trustee v. Steel Brothers (1901), 1 Ch. 279; 70 L. J. Ch.51; 40 W. R. 120; 17 T.L.R. 45. cece eeevuennnn. 37 Boschoek Proprietary Co. v. Fuke (1906), 1 Ch. 148; 75 L. J. Ch. 261; 94 L. T. 398; 54 W. R. 359; 13 Mans. 100; 22 T.L. R. 196................. 124, I32, 143, 146, 159 Bowman v. Secular Society (1917), A.C. 349; 86 L. J. Ch. 568; 117 L.T. 161;61S. J. 478,33 TL. R.376.......... Bradford Banking Co. v. Briggs (1887), 12 A.C. 29; 56 L. J. Ch.364;56L.T.62;35 W.R.42I.......c00uuvu.nn. 64 Brailey v. Rhodesia Consolidated (1910), 2 Ch. 95; 79 L. J. Ch. 404; 102 L. T. 805; 54 S. J. 475; 17 Mans. 222.. 215 Braybrooke v. Meredith, 13 Sim. 271.. . . .............. 365 Brice v. Bannister (1878), 3 Q.B.D. 569.. cee.ee 365 Bridgewater Navigation Co., Re (1889), 14 A.C. 525; 59 L. J. Ch. 122; 61 L. T. 621; 38 W. R. 401; 1 Meg. 372.... 187, 263 Bridport Old Brewery Co., Re (1867), 2, Ch. App. 191; 15L.T. 643; 15 W.R.201...... ... .......... 123 Brinsmead & Sons v. Brinsmead (1897), 12 T. L.R. 631...... 13 Brinsmead, T. E. & Sons, Re (1897), 1 Ch. 413; 66 L. J. Ch. 290; 76 LL. IT. 100... turin iennneennnnns 13 British American Nickel Corporation v. M. J. O’Brien, Ltd. (r927), A.C. 369...... ‘ Ce eeesaae 195 British Asbestos Co. v. Boyd (1903), 2 Ch. 439; 73 L. J. Ch. 31; 88L.T.763; 51 W.R.667......ccvvvveneenann.. 146 British Equitable Assurance Co. v. Bailey (1906), A.C. 35; 725 L. J.Ch. 73; 94 L. T.1;: 13 Mans. 13; 22 T.L.R. 152 28 6