TABLE OF CASES Copal Varnish Co., Re (1917), 2 Ch. 349; 117 L. T. 508 ..... Cork & Bandon Railway v. Goode (1853), 13 C.B. 827; 22 L.. | C.P. 198; 17 Jur. 555; 1 W.R. 410............. Cotman v. Brougham (1918), A.C. 514; 87 L. J. Ch. 379; 119 L.T.162;62S. J.534;34 T.L.R. 413.......... County of Gloucester Bank v. Rudry Colliery Co. (1895), 1 Ch. 629; 64 L. J. Ch. 451; 72 L. T. 375; 43 W. R. 486, 2Mans, 223; 12 R. 183.ucernr- wrpe-- ww wd Cox-Moore v. Peruvian Corporation (1908), 1 Ch. 604; 77 L. J. Ch. 387; 98 L. T. 611; 15 Mans. 19I...........c.0u. Cree v. Somervail (1879), 4 A.C. 648; 41 L. T. 353; 28 W. R. 34 Cuff v. London & County Land Co. (1912), 1 Ch. 440; 81 L. J. Ch. 426; 19 Mans. 166; 106 L. T. 285; 28 T. L. R. 213... Currie v. Consolidated Kent Collieries (1906), 1 K.B. 134; 75 L.J. K.B.199; 94 L.T. 148. ; Pa ERE HR Cycle-makers Co. v. Sims (1903), 2 72 1. J. K.B. 160; 88 L.T.360;19T.L.R ~- Ce eee Cyclists’ Touring Club, Re (1907), ~~; 76 L. J. Ch. 172; 06 L..T. 780: 14 Mans. 52; <- i. R.220.. . hE Dafen Tin Plate Co. v. Llanelly Steel Co. (1920), 2 Ch. 124.... Daily Telegraph Newspaper Co., Ltd. v. M’Laughlin (1904), AC 776 coiivinenverrns » , Danby v. Coutts & Co. (1885), 2 Ch. D. 500. D.’Angibau, Re (1880), 15Ch. D. 228. .... .... . D’Arcy v. Tamar Railway (1867). L. R. 2 Ex. 158; 36 L. J Ex.37;13L.T. 626; 4H. &C. 463; 14 W.R.068.... . Davey v. Williamson (1898), 2 O.B. 194; 67 L. J. OQ.B. 66; 78 L.T. 755; 46 W. R. 57x... ove oun. Davison v. Gillies (1879), 16 Ch. D. 347 (»); 50 L. J. Ch. 192 (n° 44 L. T. 92 (n).... eerie : Dawson v. African Trading Co. (1898), 1 Ch. 6; 67 L. J. Ch. 47; 77 L. T = W. R. 132; 4 Mans. 372; 14 T.L.R. 30... . ber eaeeeee.as 145 Debenham v. Mellon C 24; 50 L. J. Q.B. 155; 43 L.T. 673; 2 q J.P.252.... oo... Demerara Rubber Cu. |. C... 331; 82 L. J. Ch. 220; 108 L. T. 318.. SE. EERE REE EE. F8. Dent v. London Tramways Co. (1880), 16 Ch. D. 344; 50 L. | Ch. 190; 44 L. T. 01... .. (0. civil eioen De Rosaz v. Anglo-Italian Bank (.869), L.. R. 4 O.B. 462; 38 L.J.OQB 161- WwW © Cee Deuchar v. Gas Ligl~ T.L.R.563.... Dexine Co., Re (1+ ce Deyes v. Wooc . K.B. 55% LT. .o Dickinson v. Doc ds . Discoverers’ Fincic =or-auc ., Lindlar’s Case (1+ £ Cu. 12 ~¢! ).Ch. 103; 101 I.. T. 150; 54 Sol. 87-26 T. i. IX. 201 863 PAGE AR [6 "52 197 81 185 238 24¢ [ 20 273 275 277 Toi 8 38 SU 7