866 SECRETARIAL PRACTICE
PAGE
Gibson v. Barton (1875), 10 Q.B. 329; 44 L. ].M.C. 81; 32 L. T.

396;23W.R. 858... iii iiiiiiiiii en e.. T129, 130
Gilbert's Case, Re National Provincial Marine Insurance Co.

(1870), 5 Ch. App. 559; I8 W.R.938................ 92
Glossop v. Glossop (1907), 2 Ch. 370; 76 L. J. Ch. 610;

97 L. T. 372; 14 Mans. 246. ....................... 148
Gold Fields, etc., Co. v. Consolidated Gold Fields, etc., Ltd.

(1926), 1 Ch. 338; 95 L. J. Ch. 329; 135 L. T. 14; 42

T.L.R. 261; 70S. J. 426.0 c.uveenninenn nanan. 327
Gooch’s Case (1872), 8 Ch. App. 266..... ... 106, 108
Goodfellow v. Nelson Line (1912), 2 Ch. 324......couuun.... 195
Goodwin v. Robarts (1876), 1 'A.C. 476; 45 L. J. Ex. 748;

35 L.T. 179; 24 W.R. 987. ........ciiiiiiinnnn... 199
Gosling v. Gaskell (1897), A.C. 575; 66 L. J. Q.B. 848........ 206
Goslings ‘& Sharpe v. Blake (1889), 23 Q.B.D. 324; 58 L. J.

QB. 446;61L.T. 311; 37 W.R. 774. . cece v vena.
Governments Stock Co. v. Manila Railway Co. (1897), A.C. 81;

66L. J.Ch. 102; 75 L. T. 553; 45 W.R. 353. .........

Great Britain Steamship v. White, 19 Rettie, 109............
Great Northern Piccadilly, etc., Ry. v. Att.-Gen. (1909), A.C. 1
Great Northern Salt & Chemical Works, Re (1889), 44 Ch. D.

472; 59 L. J. Ch. 288; 62 L. T. 231; 2 Meg. 46........
Greenwell v. Porter (1902), 1 Ch. 530; 71 L. J. Ch. 243; 86

L.T. 220; g Mans. 85..ccueeiuninenrnernennnnnenn
Grenfell v. Inland Revenue (1876), 1 Ex. D. 242. ...........
Greymouth Point Elizabeth Co., Re (1904), 1 Ch. 32; 73

L.J.Ch.g2; 11 Mans. 85.............. Cea
Griffith v. Paget (1877), 5Ch.D. 894......c0u0 © .vvunnn.

- v. ——— (1877), 6 Ch. D. 511; 46 L. J. Ch. 493;

37 LL. TT. 141; 25 W. R523. cient ii ieeennennn
Grosvenor Bank v. Boaler (1885), 49 J.P. 774. vce vvvvvnnnn.
Grundy v. Briggs (1910), 1 Ch. 444; 79 L. J. Ch. 244; 101

L.T.001;5480L JO. 163... .00uiiirininnnrnnnnnnn.
Guardian Assurance Co. (1917), 1 Ch. 431; 86 L. J. Ch. 214;

116 L. T. 193; 61 S. J. 232;33 T.L.R. 169.......... 34
Gunn’s Case, Re Universal Banking Corporation (1867),

3 Ch. App. 40;37L. J.Ch. 40; 17L.T. 365; 16 W.R. 97 56
Hadgett v. Inland Revenue, L. R. 3 ExD. 46..............
Halifax Sugar Co. v. Francklyn (1890), 59 L. J. Ch. 591; 62

L.T. 563; 2 Meg. I20...cuvun: vrierinncnenennenns
Hamilton v. Vaughan-Sherrin Electrical Co. (1894), 3 Ch. 589;

63 L. J. Ch. 795; 71 L. T. 325; 43 W. R. 126; 8 R. 750. .
Hammond v. Prentice (1920), 1 Ch. 201; 89 L. J. Ch. 91;

36 T. LL. R.98. iii i ei ei eee 9
Hannan’s Empress Co., Re (1896), 2 Ch. 643; 65 L. J. Ch.

002; 75 Li. LL 45. citi titi ti ie ienenanennnen 55
Harben v. Phillips (1882), 23 Ch. D. 14; 46 L. T. 334; 31

W.R. I73.0iiiiit tiiiiieine tv tieenenena.. 130, 148
Hardoon v. Belilios (1901), A.C. 118: 70 L. J. P.C. 9; 83 L. T.

572: 40 W.R. 200: 17T. LL. R. 126. . areas 65

353
I51
57