TABLE OF CASES
Harper v. Godsell (1870), L.R.5Q.B. 422.......... ......
Harris's Case, Re Imperial Land Co. of Marseilles (1871),
7 Ch. App. 587; 41 I. T. Ch. 621; 26 L. T 7&~ ~~
W. R. 600... ees .
Hawkes v. Eastern Counties Railway (1855), 5 H. L. ©. 337;
24L.J. Ch. 601;3W.R.609.............
Hawksley v. Outram (1892), 3 Ch. 359........
Hay v. Goldsmidt (1804), 2 Smith 79; 1 Taunt. 349.......
Haycraft Gold Reduction Co., Re (1900), 2 Ch. 230; 69 L. ,
Ch. 497; 83 L. T. 166; 7 Mans. 243; 16 T. L. R. 350....
Henderson v. Bank of Australasia (1890), 45 Ch. D. 330; 59
L. J. Ch. 704; 2 Meg, 30%. conv smnnsnnnecansunes 134
Hendricks v. Montagu (1881), 17 Ch. D. 638; 50 L. J. Ch. 456;
44 L.T. 879; 30 W.R. 160........... cans
Hercules Insurance Co., Re, Pugh & Sharman’s Cases (1872)
13 Eq. 566; 41 J.. T. Ch. 580; 267
Hester & Co., Re (18- L.T.Co -
Hibberd v. Knight (i040, 2 Ex. 11; .
IBZ sonur v su =
Hibblewhite v. McMorine (1840), 6 M. & W. 200; -
Ex. 217; 2 Rail. Cas. 51........cvvnenn.
Hilder v. Dexter (1902), A.C. 474; 71 L. J. Ch. 781; &7 ..
311; 51 W. R. 225; 9 Mans. 378; 7 Com. Cas. z.
18 T. L. R. 800
Hill v. Patton, 8 East ~ Cee eee eee
Hobbs v. Wayet (1&87), 36 Ch. BP. 256; 57 L. T. 225,
W.R.78..0. cosn ..
Home & Colonial Insurance Co., Re (1930), 1 Ch. 102..2~0, 25.
Home and Foreign Investment Cor-'oration. Re (191%
72; 106 L. T. 259; 56 Sol. jo
Homer District Gold Mines, Re (I.
L.J.Ch.134;60L.T. 97.
Hooper v. Herts (1906), 1 Ch. 549; 75 L
324; 54 W. R. 350; 13 Mans. 85...
Hopkinson v. Mortimer Harley & Co. (1917) : Cn. 64
86 L.J.Ch. 467; 116 L. T. 676;61S.).384. ....
Houghton & Co. v. Nothard Lowe & Wills (1927), 1 K.B. 246. .z
Household Insurance Co. v. Grant (1879), 4 Ex. D. 216; -&
L.J.Ex.577;41L.T. 298; 27 W.R.858.......
Howard's Case, Re Leeds Banking Co. (1866), 1 Ch. App. 56
36 L. J. Ch. 42;14L.T. 742; 14 W. R. qo?
Hoylake Railway Co., Re (1874), 9 Ch. App. <7; 43 L. J. ¢
529; 30L.T.213;22W.R. 443..........
Hudson v. Granger (1821), 5 B. & Ad. 27.... .
Hughes-Hallett v. Indian Mammoth Mines /*R82"
561; 52 L. J.Ch. 418; 48 L. T. 107; 31 W.R.z
Huntley & Palmer v. Reading Biscuit Co. (1893), o T.L. k.

3

[llingwor-

‘ouldsworth (1904), A.C. 355; 73 L.
T. 602; 53 W. R. 113; 12 Mans. 141;
syd

24

867
AGE
275

3

14%
162

0

Uy