3 i AGRICULTURAL RELIEF Mr. KixncHELOE. In order to have a bill that will become law you had better find out from the President, because we might send one down there and he would veto it and we would have to go home without anything. Mr. Jones. Have you had some conferences with the President recently, since this session began? Mr. Gray. I see the President occasionally on various projects. Mr. Jones. Have you any assurance—without undertaking to quote him—that if we were to insert this second condition the Presi- dent would probably approve the bill with the equalization fee in it, or have you anything that you might specify that would give us a reason to hope for that? Mr. Gray. I would describe President Coolidge’s qualifications in this way, Mr. Jones: He has a remarkable facility for getting infor- mation and giving none. Mr. Jones. What I was getting at—he gave out a good deal of information when he vetoed the bill before. There was a good deal of information in that message. [Laughter] I wanted to know if you had any assurance that if we inserted this additional provision of section 2 he would change his attitude or might approve the bill? I think that is a very practical question. Or, have you any statement from him or indication from his attitude that might lead you to hope that he might have changed his attitude? Mr. Gray. We could not expect the President of the United States to commit himself to a representative of a citizen's group, such as that of the American Farm Bureau Federation, on a proposition like his, Whew I doubt if he has committed himself even to his own inner amily. Mr. Jones. I just wanted to know if you had any basis for a hope that he might, by putting in this additional condition, sign the bill. Mr. Gray. The basis of hope would be that it gives the loaning provisions an opportunity to be tried out if the cooperatives want to try them out; and from various sources, the President included, there has been an advocacy of the loaning mechanism of various farm relief bills; and this bill, with the se@ond condition from Senator MecNary’s bill included in Chairman Haugen’s bill, would give the loaning provisions a try out and leave the equalization fee plan, as we stated a while ago, a pinch hitter, a thing to be used when there was a real surplus question which the loaning provisions will not grapple with and can not handle. Mr. JonEs. If the President did approve it; but I was wondering if you had any basis for hope that even if we put section 2 in and made this condition in that further way, the President would approve it and thus give you a chance to try it out. I am asking that in an honest effort to get some information. if we can. I think that is an important question. Mr. Gray. It is an important question and I wish someone could answer 1t with more specifications than I can give. [Laughter.] Mr. Kercaam. Mr. Gray, suppose the bill without the equaliza- tion fee passes both Houses of Congress and is approved by the President, and then after two years trial—I think this would cover the present and might have some effect upon legislation after two years, including 1928 and 1929—do you not believe that the prophesies of your people as to the effect of these other provisions will have been