<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Agricultural relief</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>183193440X</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 
203 
Mr. Kenoe. I hope you will do that gracefully and vote for the 
McNary-Haugen bill, as you did before. 
Mr. KincHeLok. Mr. Kehoe, if it gets down to the question of 
what the President is going to do, I am going to say, as a member 
of the committee, I do not take any stock in that at all. Of course, 
as you say, the framers of the Constitution gave the power to initiate 
legislation and to legislate to Congress. It further fortified that by 
providing that a two-thirds vote can override the veto of any Presi- 
dent. So, I agree with you heartily that it is a question of Congress 
shouldering its responsibility the same as the President shoulder his. 
Now, suppose the bill that the gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Adkins, 
proposed, is put up to the President, I am frank to say, and I 
think you will agree, that I have more respect for the President than 
to say he would sign such a bill as that, in view of his former state- 
ment. 
Mr. Kenoe. In view of his errors of the past. I do not know 
what may be his errors of the future. 
Mr. KixcHELOE. So far as practicable all legislation that will be 
enacted here for the President to sign, I think you will agree with me 
that the President is just about as likely to sign this as he would be 
a debenture plan, when you are going to disturb the tariff proposition, 
do you not think so? 
Mr. Kenok. I think so. I think if the President decides to sign 
any bill he will finally decide to sign this one. But there is no 
responsibility anywhere on the President for legisaltion—now here. 
He has the privilege of vetoing, and I will concede that it has grown 
probably into a great deal more force and effect than it should have, 
and it is not without complaint that I have heard members of Con. 
gress saying that the rights of the legislative branch of the Govern- 
ment were being encroached upon in various and sundry ways by 
boards and other things. 
It is a serious problem for Congress to sustain its responsibility. 
If I were a Member of Congress I would resent the slightest encroach- 
ment upon the rights of Congress. There has already been too many 
of them, gentlemen; and you are the man at the foundation of this 
Government; you are its foundation; there could be no executive, 
there could be no judiciary, if the legislative branch had not created 
both of them. You are.the man of the house; you furnish the 
money to run this Government. There can be no war declared 
without you. If you did not exist there could be no executive and no 
judiciary part of this Government. 
So the Member of Congress that does not realize and does not, feel 
the responsibility and the great honor that has been conferred upon 
him by being a member of this great body falls short of his proper 
conception. I consider it one of the greatest honors of my life to 
have been a member of this body. I say everywhere that I never 
saw a body of men discharge its duties with more fidelity and efficiency 
than they have. In the years I was here I never attended a com- 
mittee mecting—since I have been here I have never attended a 
meeting of this committee but what the majority of the members 
were here ready to do the best they could. I never saw the hour of 
12 arrive when the men elected to perform the duty of assembling 
the House were not there to perform their duty, and while there 
Is some jocular criticism of the Congress and some foolish people 
try to make fun of it, gentlemen, the people realize what vou are.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
