<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Agricultural relief</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>183193440X</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>244 
AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 
Mr. Wyant. My position is this, that out of every dollar’s worth 
of manufactured products of steel, wire, machinery and every kind, 
the farmer gets 85 cents for food supplies, clothing, ete. That is a 
benefit to the farmer. Now, I believe that if there is any advantage 
in that, if any protection for the manufacturer, I believe the farmer 
ought to be placed on the same basis; and I have voted accordingly, 
as my record will show. 
4 Mr. AgwEIL, Do you think the equilization fee will put him in 
1at position: 
Mr. Wyant. I am not sure about that. I am in favor of doing 
something to relieve the farmer; whether the equilization fee is the 
best method or not I do not know. 
Mr. AsweLL. Would you be in favor of a bill without the fee in 
order to get some legislation? 
Mr. Wyant. I am in favor of any bill that will give him relief. I 
may not go the limit, but I will go te any extent that will give the 
farmers relief in a bill I think the President will approve | 
Mr. ASWELL. aon do not think he will approve—— 
r. Wyant. He has not approved 
Mr. AsweLr. I do not think he al of the fee it if it goes back with 
thy Sg ation fee in it. BO v 
r. Wyant. I think that will be futile. My suggestion i 
representatives of the farmers agree upon cometh the i os 
tion, something that the President will approve of, and if a ot 
get all you want this Congress, get it from the next C Ses: Tan net 
Mr. WELLER. I believe that you are my friend. 1 wan oe to. 
you that any legislation that will undertake to cure thi hn ° dot Te 
av) of that Sxportable surplus—and that means that that which 
z In expor o i 1t1 i 
of the world. Hononor “i you will Se Ee Be Le 
able to operate for a year as a buyin Wd sellin mOnEy We Wy he 
as sure as we do that for the oni of th Ar Ep a i 
going to overbid on the price we pay for th bt produc eo sone 
in the hole, and we will only last a ear, _ i that equalization fos 
1s a revolving fund and it has got to be repl 
of it is that w a an replaced, because the theory 
the sams oa ° hai i find to get rid of that exportable surplus, 
modities for the best price obtainable: and a 
to get an approach towards an A Sand whan Wwe do that wo expect 
crop that DD onoumad foes an jamaioay price for that portion of our 
e figure | 
andl « Jom, that even on your present retail prices, the difference 
¢ price for our raw product can not 1 
in what you pay, for the ream not make very much difference 
for by your distribution. E Oo pion cuss arg lagily sepia 
American scale of pay io prery fellow that handles it is getting the 
little bit more service in the DS enwmats, SA wo Aunrionys pouine 8 
T 90 not Leliora te nari preparation of our foods and all that. 
a set of fizures showing i ; any difference to you. I did have 
$2.20. When our whoo ig between 80-cent wheat and 
figures showed an astonishing] rom $230 dowp $0 20 gents, those 
made on a loaf of bread. 1 2 prpell amount of difference that that 
but it was less than one-t th o sould repent it to the committe, 
Mr. Boots. May I be ' of a cent on each loaf. 
here nearly two waels = hem for Just a short while? I have been 
2 to be heard. I have g plan for the</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
