<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Agricultural relief</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1831935244</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>634 
AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 
Mr. Lankrorp. No; I would go further the bill provides for the 
full market average value for which the commodity sold for the 
preceding 10 years, which might be higher than the value at time of 
the loan. 
I realize this, Mr. Purnell, that if you loan the farmer the average 
price at which cotton has sold for the last 10 years or the average 
price at which wheat has sold for the last 10 years; and cotton is 
selling at 4 or 5 cents below that, or wheat is selling at several cents 
below that price, it would be a foolish thing for the Government’s 
agency to make that kind of a loan without additional safeguards. 
Mr. PurneLL. Suppose the market price is below that average 
and a loss is sustained.” Who is to pay that? 
Mr. Lankrorp. That is a proper question and I am glad to answer 
it. 
If 75 per cent of the producers of a commodity sign contracts 
that they will control their production, and, furthermore, that not 
only will they control their production, but that they will not offer 
for sale a single bushel of wheat of a single pound of cotton when the 
operation begins, but that they will hold it; if they need money they 
will borrow 1t from the bank and only sell for a fair price there will 
be no loss. The price can not drop below that average price at 
which they can borrow money. Why? Because the farmer will not 
sell below a price at which he can borrow money under the provisions 
of this bill. I provide in the bill that the commodity itself shall be 
the sole and only collateral for the debt, and that no judgment can 
be taken against the individual farmer for any loss. 
Mr. Apkins. Will you yield for a question? - 
Mr. Lankrorp. Yes; I will be glad to, Mr. Adkins. 
Mr. Apkins. In my own country where they have only 5 per cent 
of the storage facilities for wheat and oats, do you think you can get 
them to go into a contract of that kind? 
Mr. LankrForp. I am not so sure about that in the wheat section 
Of course, if they could get them to go into it I believe it would work. 
You know more about the wheat proposition than I do. 
I provide in the bill that there shall be such storage as shall be 
necessary, and I provide further in the bill that if possible and 
practical and feasible that the farmer be allowed to keep his com- 
modity and store it himself, by properly insuring it, and making him 
responsible for it. 
Mr. Apkins. The point I had in mind is that practically all of them 
have practically no storage facilities for that, whether they would go 
into a contract of that kind or not and then have to build storage bins. 
Mr. Lankrorp. I believe it can be worked out. It can be worked 
out for them to hold it separately or that wheat to be stored in bins 
and shipped to places where it could be held, but for the farmer still 
to retain his title in so many bushels of wheat of a certain grade, 
stored for his use. He could hold the receipt instead of holding the 
actual wheat. 
Mr. Swank. Do you make any provision for the acquisition of 
warehouses? 
Mr. Lankrorp. I left that as a matter of detail to be worked out 
later. If the committee should decide that my bill embodies a 
oood idea, that is properly a matter than can be worked out later.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
