<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The fiscal problem in Missouri</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1833271335</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>162 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
TasLe 48: Motor VEnICLE REGISTRATIONS COMPARED 
Write THE NUMBER ASSESSED FOR THE GENERAL 
ProrrrTv Tax, BY CouNntiES, 1927 (continued) 
Source: Data for Registrations from the Office of the Secretary of State 
County 
Putnam. . .. 
Balls, ,oouvesn. 
Randolph. ..... 
Ray......... 
Revnolds. . - . 
Ripley....... cen 
St. Charles... cere 
Bi. Clade. cviowarsssmmnnnnssns 
St. Francois. .....ovevueurernn. 
Ste. Genevieve .. 
St. Louis. . . 
Saline. .... 
Schuyler.......... 
Scotland... 
Scott 
Shannon. . 
Shelby....... 
Stoddard. . .. 
Stone...... —... - 
Sullivan. . 
Taney... 
0 
Vernon. ..... 
Warren. . 
Washington. ..... .. 
Wayne. ......... Free 
Webster. ........ dw 
Worth, ........-- I 
WrIghE, . covrnn ssa nmmrrmrsnns 
St. Louis City. .....c.coninnn 
Total. ... 
All counties, excluding Buchan. 
an, Greene, Jackson, and St. 
Louis Citv. 
Number of 
Registra- 
*10ng} 
Number 
Assessed for 
the General 
Property 
Te? 
Ratio of 
Number 
Assessed to 
Registration 
er Cent 
Average As- 
sessed Value 
per Motor 
Vehicle 
Acceccedd 
2,256 
2,108 
5,521 
4,195 
1138 
1,226 
1,599 
3,557 
2.267 
or 
54.5 
75.9 
64.4 
54.0 
68.1 
$113.33 
88.94 
204.97 
142.77 
158.70 
1,043 
5,304 
2,122 
7,146 
1371 
820 
2,778 
1,691 
3,624 
997 
78.6 
52.4 
79.7 
50.7 
727 
[29.35 
173.62 
127.28 
112.39 
117.92 
46,265 
6,496 
1,692 
2,163 
2177 
26,729 
3,053 
928 
902 
7.390 
57.8 
47.0 
54.8 
41.7 
50.3 
179.90 
199.25 
83.69 
102.80 
76 7Q 
1,012 
3,052 
3,520 
1,432 
Y 604 
783 
1,649 
2.438 
1,044 
1.692 
77.4 
54.0 
69.3 
72.9 
65.0 
132.29 
157.52 
110.93 
124.35 
99 01 
1,053 
2.273 
£862 
L740 
468 
1,520 
3,510 
904 
44.4 
66.9 
72.2 
571 
178.23 
121.93 
100.78 
141 99 
1,415 
1,286 
2,723 
1,573 
2,313 
147 441 
1,118 
826 
1,567 
1,551 
1,492 
00.420 
79.0 
64.2 
57.5 
98.6 
€15 
fe 1 
118.71 
123.02 
144.80 
121.36 
149.00 
279.17 
480.927 
458.439 
&amp;7.3 
192.42 
404.378 }oer01a 62.6 139.16 
1 For registration year 1927. 
2 Computed from valuation and average assessed value in Biennial Report of the 
State Tax Commission, 1927-1928. 
3 Data from Biennial Report of the State Tax Commission, 1927-1928, except 
for those counties the valuation for which was changed by the State Board of 
Equalization. The average value for the latter counties was recomputed.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
