<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The fiscal problem in Missouri</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1833271335</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>226 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
TasLe 73: Ratios oF ASSESSED VALUATION TO SALES 
Varvg, Farms iv Boone County, Missouri, 1910- 
© 1914 anp 1923-1928 
Source: Mclean, E. E. The Ratio of Assessed Value to Sale Value of Real 
Property in Boone County, 1910-1914 and 1923-1928 
Ratio of Assessed 
Valuation to Sales 
Value. Per Cent 
Year 
910. 
011 vw» 
Number of 
Transactions 
330 
258 
7 
2¢2 
235 
1.362 
19°. 
1910t0 =~ ~~ 
1923. .... 
1924. .......... 
1925... .... 
1926. iii een 
1927. oii 
1928... .. 
1993 to 197° 
101 
65 
77 
7 
63 
62 
59 
ps 
ratios for the years 1925 through 1928 in this county may 
indicate a conscious attempt on the part of those in authority 
to adjust the valuations of farm property so as to conform 
with the average for the state as a whole. Thus, in 1928 the 
ratio as computed from the data for 75 rural property trans- 
fers was 59%, as compared with 779, in 1925. The ratio of 
this county for 1928 is close to the average for farm properties 
in the state in 1929. On the other hand, the ratios for the 
earlier years were unquestionably much higher than the 
average for farm properties in the state. 
Another form of variation in farm assessments involves 
differences in several sections of the same county. The data 
for Boone County shown in Table 74 indicate the nature of 
this type of variation. In this instance the variations were 
found to be relatively small, the minimum being 649, for 
township 45, and the maximum, 75%, for township 51. 
Table 75 shows the rural transfers in Boone County for 
the years 1923 through 1928 with the data grouped according 
to the acreage of the farms. In view of the wide difference in 
ratios between the smaller and the larger farms and the fact 
that when all of the farms were grouped into four classifica- 
tions the ratios increase as the size of the farms increases, the</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
