<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>The fiscal problem in Missouri</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1833271335</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>CHAPTER X 
PROBLEMS OF TAX BURDEN 
ROBLEMS of tax shifting and final incidence are 
P among the most difficult found in taxation, as well as 
in economic theory. Although a tax is paid by an 
individual or a corporation, it does not follow that the burden 
rests on the payer. It is generally agreed that certain kinds 
of taxes cannot be shifted except under very unusual condi- 
tions, that other taxes are always shifted, and that taxes 
which do not fall in either of these categories are shiftable in 
varying degrees. Much of the theory concerning the shifting 
and final incidence of taxation is speculative or hypothetical 
in nature, and the research investigator must, in many cases, 
approach specific problems by means of hypothetical ex- 
amples. In other cases, it is possible to obtain data bearing 
on the question, and such conclusions may be reached as the 
data seem to warrant. 
In the present study it is proposed to consider (1) the 
burden on tangible and intangible property, (2) the burden 
of the Missouri income tax with specific reference to the 
arban nature of the tax, (3) the tax burden on corporations, 
(4) the burden on state and national banks, and (5) the 
burden of motor vehicle taxation. In some instances it will 
be found that the available information is hardly sufficient to 
justify any conclusions. When it is not possible to analyze a 
problem thoroughly, its nature will be pointed out, and the 
information necessary for its solution will be indicated. 
Tue BurDEN ON TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY 
It is frequently contended that tangible property, particu- 
arly real estate, bears a disproportionate share of the Mis- 
souri state and local tax burden, and that intangible prop- 
erty is paying much less than its share. For purposes of 
llustration, let us assume that A owns real estate in an 
Yi7</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
