<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1850495947</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES. 
335 
simes of political ferment, such as the present, these tend to become 
frequent, and while they are fortunately ephemeral, they cause in the 
aggregate appreciable dislocation of industry. 
Political and Other Influences. 
At certain periods factors which were not economic had an im- 
portant influence on industrial strife. The worst period of such unrest 
1920-21) coincided with the occurrence of intensive political agitation. 
A few strikes were organised by political leaders ; more frequently op- 
ponents of Government wused their influence to intensify disputes which 
were economic in origin. Recently other influences have appeared ; the 
spread of communism has affected the workers in certain places, parti- 
cularly Bombay, and in the big mill strikes which have occurred there 
luring the last few years communist leaders and organisations have played 
3 leading part. Another new development has emerged in at least two 
recent strikes of importance in which some of those acting with the 
workers were also interested in the influence of the strike upon commodi- 
ties and share markets. But although workers may have been influenced 
oy persons with nationalist, communist or commercial ends to serve, we 
selieve that there has rarely been a strike of any importance which has 
not been due, entirely or largely, to economic reasons. 
Experience of Works Committees. . 
We turn now to a brief review of the various methods adopted 
both to prevent the occurrence of disputes and to resolve them when they 
arose. The industrial unrest which followed the close of the war led to an 
examination of methods adopted in other countries, and especially in 
Great Britain. Among these, the institution of works committees 
received attention at an early stage. In 1920 the Government of India, 
while starting joint committees in their presses, directed public attention 
50 the possibilities of the idea and about the same time committees were 
formed by Messrs. Tata at Jamshedpur and in at least one of the larger 
callways. A committee appointed in Bengal in 1921, at the instance of 
the Legislative Council, to consider the causes of and remedies for indus- 
‘rial unrest, gave warm support to the idea. At the Buckingham 
and Carnatic Mills in Madras, where 9,000 workers are employed 
and where the proportion of permanent labour is large, a works 
committee was formed in 1922 under the name of the Workpeople’s 
Welfare Committee. It was started by the management with the 
object of securing closer contact with the workers by the discussion 
and settlement of matters affecting their interests. The constitution of the 
sommittee is kept as elastic as possible and is subject to enlargement as 
sircumstances demand. In addition to the President and Vice-Presi- 
dent, 1t is now composed of 26 representatives of the workers and ten of 
She management. The former are elected annually by a secret ballot of 
workers with more than one year’s service in the different departments. 
The welfare superintendent is ex-officio secretary and two labour 
representatives are elected to serve as assistant secretaries. The proceed- 
ngs of the meetings, which are held fortnightly, are printed in Tamil and</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
