4174
CHAPTER XXV.

Need for Co-operation.

So far as cases of this kind are concerned, we would observe that
the need of regulation appears to us to be so imperative as to justify the
risk involved. Looking at the matter from the wider point of view, we do
not believe that it is to the ultimate advantage of any part of India to
permit the working of young children, or any inhumane conditions, and we
suggest that, where danger of the kind we have mentioned appears to be
real, an effort should be made to obtain the active co-operation of adjoining
States. "If the considerations which we have endeavoured to set out
commend themselves to the people of British India, they should not fail
bo evoke a response from the Rulers of the States. At the same time
efforts at local co-operation will not secure any lasting solution of the
difficulty. In discussing the merits of central and provincial legislation,
we limited our view to the provinces. But we must point out that even
the closest co-operation between provinces is insufficient. So long as
there exist side by side areas in which legislation is comparatively
backward, there will be a handicap to progress in the rest of India.
There are, therefore, good grounds for making labour legislation both
a federal and a provincial subject. If this were done, it would be
essential in the application of legislation in the States to secure the observ-
ance of the principle of gradualness, to which we have referred else-
where. Any attempt to secure uniformity by a rapid process of levelling
up might prove a serious bar to lasting progress. But if there is reasonable
security against such a danger, federal legislation offers a more complete
solution of the problem than can be obtained otherwise ; and we urge that
this possibility should be carefully considered. If it does not prove
practicable at present, efforts should be directed towards securing that, as
early as possible, the whole of India participates in making progress in
labour matters. The end should be to reach a stage when, in respect of
the leading labour laws, recognised minimum standards are applicable
throughout the whole of India.

The States and the Industrial Council.

In our discussion of the Industrial Council, whose establishment
we recommend, we limited our view to British India. But we believe
that, for those States in which there is appreciable industrial development
and which desire to co-operate, the Council would offer a suitable channel
for co-operation. It could be enlarged and adjusted to admit of their
representatives. It will be necessary to recognise that the difference of
standards between British India and Indian States will for some time pre-
clude uniformity in new laws, and it might be necessary for the Council
bo consider separately proposals for British India and for Indian States and
bo leave the final voting on such proposals only to representatives of that
division to which the proposals are intended to apply. We feel sure that
any States which are willing to co-operate will be equally ready to agree
that the conclusions of the Council on legislation should automatically
receive early consideration at the hands of the competent authority within
the State.

A fi aed (fry