OF LABOUR. 61 change for his labour, and could not starve. It will be replied, perhaps, that corn is high too, and therefore, although labour is high, the labourer obtains little corn. But if corn and labour are both affirmed to be high, the asser- tion must mean, that they are high in relation to other commodities, as it is an absurdity to say, that they are both at once high in relation to each other. If therefore the labourer ob tains little corn, labour must be low in relation to corn. The same result will be obtained if the defi- nition of value is substituted for the term. The author's proposition then would be, it is perfectly consistent with a great power of com- manding commodities in exchange for his la- bour, that the labourer should be almost starv- ing, and perfectly consistent with a small power, that the labourer should be living in great ease and comfort.” This is asserting power to be in an inverse ratio to the effects produced *. See Note B.