<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>What is wrong with the British iron and steel industry?</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1868556093</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>VTECH 
i i = 
IN &amp;lt; 
Wy ry. ere 
= Bibliothey 2 
It is interesting also to note that of the total products: 3 ‘ 
of 1929 the producing countries found absorption ‘in th Y 5 / 
own home markets for about 88 per cent. of that produc * Kiel x 
tion. As regards the British market, while there are no “&amp;lt; 
axact figures of iron and steel consumption available, the 
following table sufficiently indicates its importance in re- 
lation to our production of raw steel :— 
HOME CONSUMPTION OF IRON &amp; STEEL 
(Millions of Tons.) 
Production of steel in- 
gots and castings 
* Imports of iron and 
steel CO .. 
Total  .. 2s 
* Less exports of iron 
and steel .. Lo. 
Home consumption 
1018 
7:66 
2.01 | 
9-67 | 
3-84 | 
E.Qo | 
1927 
1928 
1920 
1980 
9:10 | 
88.59 
9:85 
~.80 
3.80 
2.78 
2.67 | 
2.60 
12-90 
11-80 
12-82 | 9-90 
3-86 | 8.81 
3.83 | 2.84 
0:04! 749! 8.491 7.06 
* Excluding pig iron and ferro-alloys. 
We have previously indicated that some of the main 
causes of the present situation in the iron and steel in- 
dustry were outside its control. These have arisen from 
the War and the financial policy of this country. 
The industry played a vital part in the conduct of that 
campaign, but it left an aftermath of difficulties which, 
while they have been considerably modified. have not yet 
disappeared. 
During the War the entire activities of the industry 
were directed to meeting the needs of the country, and in 
the last three years of that period the most intense effort 
was made to increase productive capacity, with the result 
that, as already disclosed, British capacity for production 
of raw steel was increased by 50 per cent. There would 
have . been a development of productivity had the War 
not have taken place, but the extent of this would have 
borne a truer relation to the normal increase in demand 
tor iron and steel. 
As it was, the termination of the War and the cessa- 
tion of Government requirements threw the industry back 
on its own resources with an enormous increase in pro- 
ductive capacity, while its normal trade relations had 
f 
J)</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
