TABLE OF CASES CITED XXiX
R. v. Belleau, 7 App.Cas. 473 : 1627.
R. v. Bennett, 1 O.R. 445; 2 Cart.
634: 701 n. 1.
Reg. v. Bertrand, 1 P.C. 520 + 1357 n. 1.
Reg. v Bester, 21 Q.L.R. 238 : 380.
Reg. v. Bowell, 4 B.C. 498: 718 n.2,
824 n. 1.
R. v. Boyce and Roberts, ex parie
Rustichelli, (1904) S.R. (Qd.) 181:
887 n. 3.
Reg. v. Brierly, 14 O.R. 525; 4 Cart.
665: 375, 1454 n. 3.
Rex v. Bruyns, 12 C.T.R. 259: 277.
R.v. Burah, 3 App.Cas. 889: 355, 717.
Reg. v. Bush, 15 O.R. 398; 4 Cart.
690: 701 n. 1.
Reg. v. Call, ex parte Murphy, 7
V.L.R. 113: 375.
R. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.,
[1911] A.C. 328; 758 n. 2.
Reg. v. Carr, 10 Q.B.D. 76 : 1356 n. 1.
The Queen v. Clarke, 7 Moo.P.C. 77:
156 n.1, 1588 n. 2.
Reg. v. College of Physicians and
Surgeons of Ontario, 44 U.C.Q.B.
564; 1 Cart. 761: 413, 666 n.,
1325 n. 1. ‘
R. v. Commonwealth Court of Concilia-
tion and Arbitration, ex parte Broken
Hill Proprietary Co. Lid., 8 C.L.R.
419: 866 n. 1.
R. v. Commonwealth Court of Concilia-
tion and Arbitration, ex parte
Whybrow & Company, 11 CLR. 1:
857-063.
R. v. Crewe, ex parte Sekgome, [1910]
2 Q.B. 576: 997 n. 1, 1622.
R. v. Cunningham, Bell, C.C. 72:
1356 n. 5.
Reg. v. Delepine, 1897 Newfoundland
Decisions, 378 : 379.
R.v. Delpori, 11 C.T.R. 412: 12451. 3.
Reg. wv. Demers, [1900] A.C. 103:
1365 n. 2.
8. v. Dodd, 2 N.Z.A.C.R. 598 : 1625.
Reg. v. Eyre, 3 Q.B. 487 : 136, 1615.
The Queen v. Farwell, 22 S.C.R. 553 :
683 n. 3.
B.v. Fisher,[1903] A.C. 158: 145n. 1.
R. v. Geldenhuys, 10 C.T.R. 369 : 276.
Reg. v. Giles, 15 C.L.J. 178 : 375 n.3.
Reg. v. The Gold Commissioner of
Victoria District, 2 B.C. (Irving),
260 : 666 n., 699 n.
The King v. The Governor of the State
of South Australia (cf. ex parte
0 Donnoghue, 2 N.Z.A.C.R. 495), 4
C.L.R. 1497 : 138, 810 n. 2.
R. v. Horner, 2 Steph.Dig. 450; 2
Cart. 817: 701 n. 1.
The Queen v. Hughes, 1 P.C. 81: 156
n. 1, 1588 n. 2.
R. v. Jameson, [1896] 2 Q.B. 425:
997 n. 1.
Reg. v. Justices of King's County, 2
Pugs. 535; 2 Cart. 499: 675 n.2,
704 n. 6.
R. v. Kakitaska, 8 W.AL.R. 154:
1356 n. 5.
R.v. Kalp, 12 C.T.R. 1008 : 277 n. 9.
Reg. v. Keyn, 2 Ex.D. 63: 375 n. 5,
1355.
Reg. v. Lawrence, 43 U.C.Q.B. 164,
1 Cart. 742: 700 n. 1.
R. v. Lesley, Bell C.C. 220 : 393.
R. v. Liepschitz, 20 C.T.R. 645: 984
n. 1.
R. v. Link and Wenner, 12 C.T.R.
144 : 277.
Reg. v. Lopes, Reg. v. Sattler, 27
L.JM.C. 48: 1356 n. 1.
Rex v. Louw, [1904] A.C. 412: 1361
n. 3.
R. v. Macdonald, 8 W.A.L.R. 149:
700 n. 1, 1574 n. 1.
R. v. Macfarlane (cf. R. v. Macleod,
8 S.C.R. 216), 7 S.C.R. 216: 142
n. 1.
R. v. Mackay, 8 S.CR. 1: 142n.L
BR. v. Malan and Bruyns, 12 C.T.R.
259 : 277.
R. v. Marais, 11 C.T.R. 467 : 277.
in re Reg. v. Marais, ex parte Marais,
[1902] A.C. 51: 411 n. 2.
Reg. v. Mee Wah,3B.C. 403: 716 n. 7.
R. v. van der Merwe, 12 C. T.R. 805:
271.
R. v. Mohr, 7 QLR. 183; 2 Cart,
257: 712 n. 2.
The Queen v. Moss, 26 S.C.R. 322:
679 n. 1. :
Reg. v. Mount, 6 P.C. 283: 375 n. 5,
1355 n. 2.
Ry Naude and others, 11 C.T.R. 93 :
77.
R. v. Nelson and Brand (Cockburn’s
charge in), 136: 1615.
The Queen v. Pattee, 5 0.P.R. 292 : 664.
Reg. v. Pearson, 6 V.L.R. 333: 375.
Reg. v. Plowman, 25 O.R. 656.: 375.
Reg. v. Prevost, 29 L.C.J. 253: 717
n. 6.
R. v. van Reenen, 12 C.T.R. 557, 710,
1056 : 277.
Reg. v. Reno and Anderson, 4 O.P.R,
281; 1 Cart. 810: 701 n. 3.
Queen v. Robertson, 3 M.R. 613: 719
n. 7.
The Queen v. Robertson, 2 8.C.R. 52;
2 Cart. 65: 678 n. 1.