<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Responsible government in the Dominions</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>Arthur Berriedale</forname>
            <surname>Keith</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1896935311</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>CHAPTER VI 
TRADE RELATIONS AND CURRENCY 
§ 1. TRADE RELATIONS 
THERE can be no clearer proof of the autonomy of the 
Colonies than their fiscal arrangements. When self-govern- 
ment was accorded to Canada, though there was no idea 
and had been no idea since 1778 of taxing the Colony 
without spending all the proceeds therein, it was bound 
by a tariff exacted from it by the Imperial Parliament 
and raised under laws enacted by the same authority! In 
18462 an Imperial Act allowed the British Colonies in Canada, 
to reduce or repeal by their own legislation duties imposed 
by Imperial Acts upon foreign goods imported from foreign 
countries into the Colonies in question. Canada soon availed 
herself of the privilege, while in 18492 a further Imperial Act 
added to the control of duties the control of the Colonial post 
office, allowing Canada full power to dispose as she would of 
her postal arrangements, a matter of great commercial impor- 
tance in a growing Colony where communications were 
difficult, and where Imperial legislation was obviously utterly 
out of place. In 18494 the remains of the navigation laws 
went, and the St. Lawrence was thrown open to the vessels 
of all nations. The Legislature had addressed the Imperial 
Government on the subject, and had urged that it was 
impossible to maintain the system of protection in the 
Colonies for British shipping when Great Britain had aban. 
+ Colonial legislation could also impose duties, and there was confusion 
and conflict ; see 5 &amp; 6 Vict. c. 49, Imperial customs officers disappeared 
largely in 1850, and practically wholly by 1855. Cf. Parl. Pap., February 4, 
1851, p. 42; July 1, 1852, p. 97 ; Hannay, New Brunswick, i. 410 seq. : ii. 
23, 172 ; Grey, Colonial Policy, ii. 870, 379. 
* 9 &amp; 10 Vict. ¢, 94. Cf. Adderley, Colonial Policy, p. 28 ; 8 &amp; 9 Vict. c. 93. 
' 12 &amp; 13 Viet. c. 66. Hitherto it had been an Imperial monopoly. 
12 &amp; 13 Vict. c. 29. The control of customs law was given by 20 &amp; 21 
Viet. ¢, 62. and see now 36 &amp; 37 Vict. c. 36. sa. 140-51.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
