<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Studies in statistics, social, political, and medical</title>
        <author>
          <persName>
            <forname>George Blundell</forname>
            <surname>Longstaff</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>1942139020</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>XIX COMMUNICABILITY OF PHTHISIS 393
The last line of the table gives the actual number of
wives dying in each interval, obtained by substituting for
1000, the number found in the previous process. viz.
4,363.
Exactly the same results would of course be obtained
by calculating from the wives to the husbands.
If there be N. medical practitioners in England and
Wales, and n of these send in returns, then (assuming no infection,
 and assuming that those who send in returns have
an average share of practice) they should have observed
during the ten years a number of cases equal to 7 of the
above numbers, though presumably they would only
record a part of the cases observed. According to the
Medical Directory for 1883, N = 15,462.
But within the decade both husband and wife would
die of phthisis, within a twelvemonth of each other, in 829
instances. If, therefore, 500 medical practitioners sent in
returns as to their experience, they should have observed
collectively about 27 such cases. This is the * probable ”
number that would have been observed, but quite apart
from infection the number actually observed might be
greater, since the number of practitioners and number
of years are not very large, and the coincidence is a
somewhat uncommon one. Again, marriage may have
some effect on phthisical mortality otherwise than through
infection (e. g. sexual selection might be imagined to have
a notable effect). It is plain, therefore, that to show
any substantial argument for the existence of infection it
would require a much larger collection of cases than has
vet been published.

1 This number does not include army and navy medical officers, but
on the other hand it does include many retired medieal men.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
