<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Cost of living in German towns</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt />
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <msIdentifier>
            <idno>866449027</idno>
          </msIdentifier>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <div>468 
STUTTGART. 
An enumeration of the rents of the woodworkers of the town made in 1902 
by their trade union showed that the average annual rent was £15 8s., or 6s. per 
week, a figure only exceeded in three other towns in Germany to which the 
inquiry extended. 
The vast majority of working-class households live in tenements of one, 
two, and three rooms, with appurtenances to which reference will be made later, 
and of these three types the tenement of two rooms is predominant. Classifying 
the whole of the 10,430 houses which were recorded by the books of the Municipal 
House Bureau as having changed hands during the year 1905, it was found that 
7,890 or 75*6 per cent, were of one, two, and three rooms, with cooking places 
attached, 1,273 (12*2 per cent.) being of one room, 3,043 (29T per cent.) of two 
rooms, and 3,574 (34*3 per cent.) of three rooms. But these houses embraced 
every section of the population, and confining attention solely to working-class 
tenements a classification covering 1,095 changes of tenancy shows that 21"0 per 
cent, were tenements of one room, 51 *8 per cent, of two rooms, and 26'9 per cent, 
of three rooms. Of these 1,095 working-class dwellings only three consisted of 
four rooms. 
The two-room tenement is the typical and normal working-man’s home, 
so this tenement is in greatest demand, insomuch that the supply is always 
insufficient, a remark which applies with only slightly less force to the 
three-room dwellings. In regretting this insufficiency the director of the 
House Bureau states in his report for 1905 :—“ The more the dwellings of this 
class are multiplied, in order to cope with the still unsatisfied need, the less will 
the great mass of the population be compelled to rent dwellings whose cost 
exceeds their means and also their personal requirements. Then an unhealthy and 
undesirable feature of our housing arrangements will gradually disappear, and 
tenants in more regular economic circumstances will be found for the smaller 
dwellings, to the satisfaction of the house-owners, though a further consequence 
would be the necessity of providing homes for unmarried people of both sexes 
belonging to that section of the population which at present lodges with 
families who, if living alone, would have to pay more rent than they could 
afford.” Without considering now whether any considerable number of the 
dwellings of the Stuttgart working classes exceed in accommodation the 
requirements of health and morality, there is no doubt that in general a 
relatively large proportion of their income goes in the one item of rent, 
and that far more often than is desirable lodgers are taken with a view to 
lightening this inevitable expenditure. Where a dwelling consists of but two 
rooms the practice of letting-off is as a rule impossible, but where three rooms 
have to be rented, either because the size or sexual division of the family 
requires it, or because a smaller house cannot be found, the few shillings a month 
that can be earned by letting a bed or half a bed to a lodger are a welcome help. 
In enumerating the rooms of a dwelling it is always understood at 
Stuttgart that there is in addition an apartment which is used as and called a 
“ kitchen,” unless the contrary is expressly said. But this “ kitchen ” is 
not a room in the sense of the “heatable room” known to German housing 
statisticians, nor yet does it correspond to the convertible kitchen (which 
may serve as a living room or bedroom or both) of some of the Rhenish 
towns of the North. The Stuttgart “ kitchen ” is a small corner cut off 
anyhow from the general scheme of the dwelling, invariably at the back, 
and generally placed at the end of the corridor or sandwiched between a 
living room and the offices, which are here found within the tenement and not 
outside upon the landing. Such a kitchen is as a rule six or seven feet square— 
in newer and better houses it may be a little larger—and only serves for cooking 
operations and for the necessary utensils connected therewith ; even a chair is 
the exception. Sometimes the “ kitchen ” is merely a corner of the living room 
partitioned off, sometimes it is without a window though a separate apartment, 
and only seldom is it a cheerful place in which a housewife can take any 
satisfaction. Nevertheless, the arrangement, though barely adequate, has the 
advantage that it increases the utility and value of the actual rooms for living 
purposes. There are in Stuttgart, however, many dwellings of a single room, 
which has to serve every function of a home, but this room has nothing in 
common with the kitchen as locally understood.</div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
