Zollhandbuch für die Ausfuhr nach Rußland 1906-1917

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 100638653X

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-39121

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Zollhandbuch für die Ausfuhr nach Rußland 1906-1917

Edition:: Vierte neu bearbeitete Auflage

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Deutsch-Russischer Verein

Year of publication:: 1912

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (XVI, 592 Seiten)

Digitisation:: 2017

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Handels- und Schiffahrtsvertrag vom 10. Februar/29. Januar 1894 einschliesslich der in ihn eingefügten Teile des Schlussprotokolls vom 09. Februar 1897 in der durch den Zusatzvertrag und das Protokoll vom 28. Juli/15. Juli 1904 abgeänderten Gestalt

Collection:: Economics Books

826 THE FEDERATIONS AND THE UNION [PART IV or interfere with the free exercise of the legislative or executive power of the Commonwealth, the attempt, unless expressly authorized by the Constitution, was to that extent invalid and inoperative. It was held that the salary of a minister of the Crown for the Commonwealth or of a member of the Commonwealth Parliament, so far as earned in Victoria, was not liable to assessment under the Income-Tax Acts of Victoria. It was also held that the question raised was one as to the limits snter se of the constitutional powers of the Common- wealth and of a state within the meaning of s. 74 of the Constitution, and that the decision of the High Court as to the question was final and conclusive unless the High Court chose to give a certificate that the matter was one which ought to be determined by His Majesty in Council, and the High Court considered that this was not a case for such a certificate to be granted. In a subsequent case, Commonwealth v. New South Wales? the Court decided infer alia that if a vendor transferred land to the Commonwealth for public purposes under the Act of 1901, he was performing a necessary instrumentality of the Commonwealth, and the transfer was not liable to be hampered by stamp duties under the New South Wales Stamp Duties Act. In the case of Webb v. Outtrim,® which was brought to the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria, which followed the decision in Deakin v Webb? the Privy Council rejected as applicable to the Commonwealth Con- stitution the principle of implied prohibition. In the judgement, which was delivered by Lord Halsbury, the Privy Council referred to the Constitution Act of 1855 as giving power to the Crown with Parliament to make laws in and ' The Supreme Court of Tasmania in The King v. Bawden (1 Tas. L. R. 156) applied the doctrine to a state abilities tax, which the Court held to be an income tax in substance, though calculated on the basis of multiples of the value of the residence. * 30. L. R. 807. 110 L R OBR5.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: error

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation