Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom

Monograph

Identifikator:
1016336950
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-27123
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (160 Seiten)
Digitisation:
2018
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
II. Profit sharing and co-partnership in private firms and companies
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • I. Scope of inquiry
  • II. Profit sharing and co-partnership in private firms and companies
  • III. Profit-sharing and co-partnership in co-operative societies
  • IV. Conversion of ordinary businesses into co-operative societies
  • Index

Full text

40 
tl.—PRIVATE FIRMS AND COMPANIES. 
of the goods are important factors, and that when a large amount of raw 
material is worked up, and when the stocks both of raw material and 
of manufactured goods are necessarily heavy, and when there is a 
constant fluctuation in prices, the apparent profits are much affected 
by these fluctuations. These matters are, of course, outside the work 
people, and they feel that their exertions may he in part neutralised by 
other causes not under their control, and this operates prejudicially on 
the working of this scheme. Could they clearly see cause and effect, and 
directly trace the results of their increased watchfulness in the increased 
prosperity of the business, then their participation in the profits would 
probably have more definite results. 
“ Fifthly.—There is no doubt that the management of the business 
by the partners is much more closely watched by the workpeople, and 
especially by the foremen and others in places of trust. 
“ Having thus endeavoured to describe some of the results of the plan 
carried out in our works, I will attempt to point out some of the lessons 
that these appear to me to teach, and also to state some of the difficulties 
that seem to me to threaten all schemes the object of which is to make 
the employed participators in the profits with their employers. 
“ First.—Unless a sufficiently large share of the profits be given, the 
desired effect will not be produced, that is to say, that increased attention 
and intelligence will not be aroused which are necessary to ensure its 
success. 
“ Secondly.—The larger the interest given to the employed, and the 
more their prosperity depends directly on the prosperity of the concern, 
the greater will their influence become. As long as a business is prosperous 
and well managed all will go on well; large profits will be divided, 
and the employees will be satisfied. But when bad times come, either 
from depression in the trade carried on, or from bad management, then 
difficulties will arise, the workpeople may become dissatisfied, and in the 
latter case especially may insist on the management being changed. In 
any case, the difficulties of the principals will be greatly increased, and 
they may come into awkwmrd collision with their workpeople. 
“ Thirdly.—I fail to see that the introduction of industrial partnerships 
will altogether solve the wages difficulty. Divide the profits as you will 
between capital and labour, it will always be a question open to dispute 
whether that division is a fair one. It is true that by introducing plans 
whereby labour is to share directly in the profits made by the joint action 
of capital and labour the total profits earned may be augmented, and the 
earnings of the labourer be also increased, yet after all he may remain 
dissatisfied with his share, and may demand either an increase of wages 
or a larger share in the profits. 
“ In conclusion, it seems to me that the experience gained by the work 
ing out of the scheme adopted by us shows that when the basis exists of 
an excellent understanding, and thorough goodwill between the masters 
and workmen, and whep the share of the profits given to the latter is not 
too large, then, the system may be carried out successfully so long as the 
management of the concern is good and the business prosperous, but 
that the results on the profitable w'orking of the business are somew'hat 
dubious. It has, however, the advantage of avoiding to a large extent the 
difficulties which might arise were the share of profits divided among the 
workpeople to be on a larger scale.” 
A system of profit-sharing deposits on lines different in certain 
respects from that just described, which is of much interest on
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report on Profit-Sharing and Labour Co-Partnership in the United Kingdom. His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.