Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom

Monograph

Identifikator:
1016336950
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-27123
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (160 Seiten)
Digitisation:
2018
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
II. Profit sharing and co-partnership in private firms and companies
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report on profit-sharing and labour co-partnership in the United Kingdom
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • I. Scope of inquiry
  • II. Profit sharing and co-partnership in private firms and companies
  • III. Profit-sharing and co-partnership in co-operative societies
  • IV. Conversion of ordinary businesses into co-operative societies
  • Index

Full text

OPINIONS OP EMPLOYEES. 
69 
Messrs. J. II. Ladyman & Co., grocers, write : — 
“We are still of the opinion that our system of profit-sharing is 
“ beneficial by creating a greater interest in the welfare of the 
“ business.” 
The Birmingham Dairy Co., Ltd., writes : — 
“ Profit-sharing is considered on the whole to have proved satisfac- 
“ tory. At the same time, the Bonus given is rather regarded as part 
“ of regular wages than as an incentive to extra zeal. 
“ This Company have up to the present time been able to satisfy 
“ their employees as regards remuneration and have not therefore 
“ been troubled with strikes or collective disputes.” 
“ C. C.” writes: — 
“ Our senior assistants and warehouseman and our travellers (most 
“ of whom have been a long time with us) make the interests of the 
“ business their own. Our relations with the whole staff are very 
“ pleasant ones. 
“ A. B.” writes : — 
“ We consider that our system of deposits promotes interest in the 
“ business and good feeling so far as it extends.” 
Messrs, Robinson Bros., Ltd., tar distillers, write : — 
“No results observed.” 
“ C. D.” writes: — 
“ Usual harmonious relations between employers and employed.” 
Messrs. John Rowntree & Sons, grocers, restaurant proprietors, 
etc., write :■— 
“ The amount of Bonus for the last two or three years has been so 
“ small that we do not think it has exercised any appreciable effect 
“ upon the employees. We believe, however, that the scheme is 
“ appreciated by them, and that its general effect is to call forth 
“ extra zeal, and to promote harmonious relationships between 
“ employers and employed. We are glad to say, however, that these 
“ have always been good in our business.” 
“ D. D.,” corn, seed, etc. merchants, write: — 
“ Trade Union regulations and practices causing some disturbance, 
“ which is likely to cause withdrawal of profit-sharing.” 
“ M. M.,” flour millers, write : — 
“ We consider the result has been satisfactory. The Bonuses have 
“ been valued and appreciated, a good feeling has existed and har- 
“ monious relations maintained and possibly difficulties have been 
“ avoided because the men know we study their interests.” 
Messrs. Stainsby & Lyon, Ltd., tar distillers, write: — 
“ There have been no strikes or labour disputes for the past 35 years, 
“ and it is thought that the profit-sharing scheme does encourage 
“ employees to work with greater zeal, and that it tends to promote 
“ harmonious relations between employer and employed.” 
The Yice-President of the Valvoline Oil Co. (Successors to 
Boult Bros. & Co.) writes: — 
“ The scheme • • : 
“ has been of advantage in encouraging careful work and stimulating 
“ exertions.” 
Messrs. Thomas Brakell, Ltd., printers, write: — 
“ We find our system of Bonus quite satisfactory.”
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report on Profit-Sharing and Labour Co-Partnership in the United Kingdom. His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.