Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The housing question

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The housing question

Monograph

Identifikator:
1023104237
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-61777
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The housing question
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Year of publication:
1922
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (125 Seiten)
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • The housing question
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

io4 
THE HOUSING QUESTION 
rate, and further, if the re-housing could not be completed 
in 3 years or the slum clearance in 6 years, owing to the 
shortage of labour, materials or other such cause, that 
the time might be extended by the Minister. It is true 
that all schemes and all extensions of time had to 
be approved by the Minister, but this condition was 
inserted in the Act, as in all similar cases, where the 
taxes are drawn upon by Local Councils, to prevent 
extravagance in detail. It was never intended by 
Parliament when it passed the Act, or by the Electors, 
that the Minister should use this power of withholding 
approval (at a period, be it borne in mind, far short 
even of the three-year period) in order to reverse 
in toto the whole Housing policy and stop the programme. 
That is what Sir Alfred Mond has done with the consent 
of the Prime Minister and his Cabinet The Govern 
ment have definitely refused since 14th July, 1921, to 
approve contracts for more than 176,000 houses. 
That is why Dr. Addison, the late Minister, resigned. 
The Prime Minister stated in the House of Commons on 
21st July, 1921, that the withholding of approval of 
the further contracts would not reduce by a single house 
the number to be built. It was a grotesque and scandalous 
misrepresentation. To-day, there are 175,000 men of 
the building trades unemployed. That is the kind of 
statement the Prime Minister thinks good enough for 
the House of Commons and the people of England. 
That is why the question, “ Did the Government 
ever really mean business ? " admits of but one answer 
—they never did.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Inkassotarif Für Asien, Afrika Und Australien. 1927.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.