Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The Industrial Revolution

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Identifikator:
1027928145
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487
Title:
The Industrial Revolution
Place of publication:
Cambridge
Publisher:
The University Press
Year of publication:
1922
Scope:
xxii S., S. 404-886
Digitisation:
2021
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • The Industrial Revolution
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

THE NAVIGATION ACT AND THE COLONIES 477 
slave trade appeared most beneficial to the mother-country?, AD, 105% 
and there are numerous official expressions of the high ’ 
opinion which Englishmen entertained of its value? 
That the negroes were terribly degraded cannot for a The traffic 
moment be doubted; dragged as they were from different Re ns 
African tribes, with no common language, or common customs, ee 
they had no traditions or interests of their own. The horrors 
of the middle passage caused a frightful amount of mortality 
and must have left most serious results, even in the cases of 
those who survived. The total number of persons, who were 
thus exported from Africa, has been very variously estimated; 
but a writer, who was professedly correcting exaggerations 
and giving what appeared an unusually low estimate, put 
it at an annual average of twenty thousand from 1680 to 
1786. The trade had attained its “highest pitch of pros- 
perity ” shortly before the commencement of the American 
War. Of the hundred and ninety English ships engaged in 
this trade in 1771, a hundred and seven sailed from Liver- 
pool, fifty-eight from London, twenty-three from Bristol, 
and four from Lancaster; the total export in a year of great 
activity was about fifty thousand®. The dimensions of the 
depend only on Planting by Negroes * * * our Colonies can never become in- 
dependent of these Kingdoms.” 
1 There was some anxiety as to the drain on the population of Africa for fear the 
sources of supplying the slave markets should be exhausted. Hippisley discusses 
the conditions of Africa and pronounces these fears illusory. Essays, dc., p. 6. 
3 Bancroft, op. cit. mm. 414. The only symptoms of humanitarian feeling 
in England were shown, oddly enough, in dicta which tended to confirm the 
rights of the slave-holder, when popular opinion did not altogether endorse them. 
There was a general impression in South Carolina that a Christian could not be 
retained as a slave—that the rite of Baptism at once conferred freedom. This 
opinion tended to check any efforts for the instruction and conversion of the 
slaves. Bishop Gibson, of Londen, was too good a canonist to countenance it for 
a moment, and the opinions of the Solicitor and Attorney-General, as to the un- 
altered right of property in Christian slaves, were eagerly welcomed by George 
Berkeley and those who had the welfare of the blacks at heart (Bancroft, 1m. 409). 
3 Bancroft calculates the average loss of life in this way at 12% per cent. of 
those exported from Africa, op. cit. 1. 405. 
4 In 1804 Liverpool possessed six-sevenths of the whole trade. Young, West 
India Common Place Book, p. 9. 
5 Edwards, In. 65. A statement of the trade for several years occurs in Parl. 
Hist. x1x. 302; it appears to place the numbers somewhat lower. A very much 
higher estimate is given by Raymal, who is said by some authorities to have 
anderrated the numbers. Bancroft (mr. 555), however, considers him to have 
arred on the side of excess; this tends to confirm the estimate given by Edwards.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Industrial Revolution. The University Press, 1922.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.