The Industrial Revolution

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1027928145

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487

Title:: The Industrial Revolution

Place of publication:: Cambridge

Publisher:: The University Press

Year of publication:: 1922

Scope:: xxii S., S. 404-886

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

564 PARLIAMENTARY COLBERTISM 4D 5 and that the administration of the poor should have become I intensely parochial. It was inevitable that this should be Al conducted with a primary regard to local convenience’, so that of foul LA there was danger of insufficient care for the needs of the of nasional poor, and of scant attention to the national interest. interest. So far as I am able to judge, however, the breakdown of the system of State supervision over the terms of employment had no injurious effect on labourers’ standard of comfort, during the seventeenth century and the first half of the eighteenth. There was a rapid growth of trade and an increased demand for labour of many sorts; the progress of enclosure, though it told against the small farmers, increased the demand for the services of hired labourers; while the general diffusion of the art of spinning would give a considerable increase to the family income. The rural labourer could eke out his wages, not merely by the exercise of privileges on the commons, but from the connection of his family with the manufacturing interest. On the other hand, a very con- siderable part of the artificers had direct connections with the soil. The Survey of 1615 shows that Sheffield cutlers, who had a considerable struggle to pay their way, combined the management of some land with the pro- duction of whittlest. At Pudsey, in the neighbourhood of Leeds, the woollen weavers practised agriculture as a by- employment at the beginning of the nineteenth century. They were able to add considerably to their personal comfort Labourers had a double source of come, 1 The introduction of a central authority to give unity to the whole system was he most important change effected by the Poor Law Reform of 1834 (see below, p. 772). The inconvenience of allowing each parish to be an independent adminis- trative unit had long been felt. See a proposal in 1652, State Papers addressed to Oliver Cromwell, edited by Nickolls, p. 89. Also compare the proposal of Nickolls, Advantages, etc. (1754), p. 207, and the argument, in 1758, by Massie, who held that the poor law of Elizabeth was one of the chief causes for the growth of pauperism. « Ag Multitudes of working People,” he continues, “are obliged to travel from Parish to Parish, and from County to County, in order to find Employment, proper Maintenance or other Relief ought to be provided for them, when and where they want it; because there cannot be a better Motive for their travelling, than a Desire to get an honest Livelihood ; and therefore they should have all possible Encourage- ment to persevere in doing what is Best for the Nation, and for Them. Giving every poor Person a Right to Relief, when and where he or she shall want it, would put an End to all Law Suits, about the Settlement of the Poor” (4 Plan for the Establishment, ete., 112). 2 Hunter, Hallamshire, 148. The pressure of pauperis at this place was very severe. See above, p. 347, n. 3.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation