Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The Industrial Revolution

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Identifikator:
1027928145
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487
Title:
The Industrial Revolution
Place of publication:
Cambridge
Publisher:
The University Press
Year of publication:
1922
Scope:
xxii S., S. 404-886
Digitisation:
2021
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • The Industrial Revolution
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

THE FIRST FACTORY ACT 629 
had been made with the cotton trade; after the principle of A-D. 1776 
state intervention had once been accepted, it became possible 
to apply it, step by step, not only to factories, but to work- 
shops as well. 
The main evil, as recognised at this time, lay, not in the a J 
excessive hours of work!, but in the conditions under which of over 
the children who had been apprenticed in cotton factories were work: 
housed and fed. The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries 
were fully alive to the peril of idleness, as the source of 
rime of every kind; the squatters on commons and the 
weavers, who worked or not as they chose, were regarded as 
dangers to the prosperity of the country, but the ordinary 
zitizen failed to contemplate the possibility of any evil arising 
from overwork. Still the public did appreciate the unwhole- 
some conditions in which the children were housed and fed, 
and the fact that they were deprived of all opportunity of 
instruction. Most of them were parish apprentices, who were 
brought in batches from their parishes, and the parish 
authorities were very negligent® about seeing that the terms 
L Dr Percival may be regarded as exceptionally far-seeing. In the report 
which he and other medical men presented to the Lancaster county magistrates in 
1784 the following passage occurs. ‘‘ We earnestly recommend a longer recess 
irom labour at noon and a more early dismission from it in the evening, to all 
those who work in cotton mills; but we deem this indulgence essential to the 
present health and future capacity for labour, for those who are under the age of 
fourteen ; for the active recreations of childhood and youth are necessary to the 
growth, the vigour and the right conformation of the human body. And we 
sannot excuse ourselves on the present occasion from suggesting to you, who are 
the guardians of the public weal, this further very important consideration, that 
the rising generation should not be debarred from all opportunities of instruction 
at the only season of life in which they can be properly improved.” Apparently 
in consequence of this report the magistrates resolved that in future they would 
not allow ‘‘indentures of Parish Apprentices whereby they shall be bound to 
owners of cotton mills and other works in which children are obliged to work 
in the night, or more than ten hours in the day.” Hutchins and Harrison, 
History of Factory Legislation, 8. 
2 This point is well brought out by Miss Hutchins and Miss Harrison in their 
excellent work on Factory Legislation, 8. 
8 The system of farming the poor (see above, p. 575) doubtless contributed to 
the neglect on the part of parish authorities. The officials had, at all events, no 
interest in interfering on behalf of the children. * It is within the compass of 
srobability, that there have been, and are yet, instances, wherein the overseers of 
the poor and more especially the assistant overseers, who are mere mercenaries 
and serve for pay, have been, and are, some of them at least, bribed by the owners 
of mills for spinning silk, cotton or woollen yarn, to visit the habitation of the
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Industrial Revolution. The University Press, 1922.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.