Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The Industrial Revolution

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Identifikator:
1027928145
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487
Title:
The Industrial Revolution
Place of publication:
Cambridge
Publisher:
The University Press
Year of publication:
1922
Scope:
xxii S., S. 404-886
Digitisation:
2021
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • The Industrial Revolution
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

A.D. 1776 
—~—1850. 
and with 
disastrous 
reswulis 
in pauper- 
ising the 
population, 
720 LAISSEZ FAIRE 
of wages which would naturally have followed in the 
circumstances of the times, from the increased area under 
tillage; in some districts an increase of money wages 
appears to have occurred in spite of it’. No obvious oppor- 
tunity of discontinuing this system arose, and what had been 
introduced as a temporary expedient became a permanent 
practice. Whatever excuse there may have been for adopting 
this course at first, its ultimate effects on rural society were 
most disastrous. By securing an income to all the labourers, 
it offered a direct encouragement to carelessness on the 
part of the men, so that the farmers complained they could 
not obtain efficient labour; while the remaining mem- 
bers of the community had a grievance, inasmuch as they 
contributed, through the rates, for the payment of services 
rendered to other people. Altogether this custom tended to 
degrade the character of the labouring class®. The Committee 
which investigated the subject in 1824 went back to first 
principles in making their reports. “There are,” they said, 
“but two motives by which men are induced to work: the 
one, the hope of improving the condition of themselves and 
their families; the other, the fear of punishment. The one 
is the principle of free labour, the other the principle of slave 
labour. The one produces industry, frugality, sobriety, family 
employing the poor of the Hundreds of Loes and Wilford (1792), [Brit. Mus. C. T. 
104 (3)], p- 8. 1 Bowley, Wages in the United Kingdom, 39. 
2 The demoralising effects became apparent to one observer at least before it 
had been in operation many months (Annals, xxv. 634). * From what will follow, 
amulation and exertion will be totally destroyed; a man working extra hours, etc., 
not doing it for his own benefit, but that of the parish. This has been the effect 
of a plan recommended by our magistrates; which, notwithstanding, I cannot but 
highly approve, as founded on liberal principles, and perhaps as little exception- 
able as anything which could have been adopted. 
«The effect of this is, that an industrious fellow, who heretofore has earned 
his fourteen shillings per week, will now only earn the price of day labour (nine 
shillings) ; nor will I blame him, for extraordinary exertions should have extra- 
ordinary reward ; nor can a man be expected to work over-hours for the relief of 
the poor-rates. Another effect is, those who work none, receive as much as those 
who do; but this we have remedied, by saying, a man having no debility ought to 
earn nine shillings. The profligate part of the women have destroyed or have no 
wheels, and say they cannot earn anything unless supplied by the parish. Our 
rates are thus risen to about three times their usual quantum, which makes the 
farmers highly dissatisfied. * * * 
“To avoid this table, the parish are at this moment in the act of beginning 
a work-house; but, fortunately for the industrious poor, the bill for the relief of 
the poor in their own houses meets that oppression.”
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Industrial Revolution. The University Press, 1922.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.