Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The Industrial Revolution

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Identifikator:
1027928145
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487
Title:
The Industrial Revolution
Place of publication:
Cambridge
Publisher:
The University Press
Year of publication:
1922
Scope:
xxii S., S. 404-886
Digitisation:
2021
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • The Industrial Revolution
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

THE REMOVAL OF PERSONAL DISABILITIES 759 
apathetic on the subject, were now keenly alive to the advant- A D. 1776 
age of retaining their new-found freedom; and on the main 
issue they were successful, for Trade Unions were permitted to 
exist, but the operatives and their friends were defeated on one 
very important point. The Act of 1824! had protected com- 
bined workmen from prosecution for criminal conspiracy under 
the common law, and this privilege was not continued®; though 
the enacting clauses of the Act of 1825 appeared to Place to 
confer this immunity®, The responsible authorities, however, 
construed the Act differently; being disinclined to give the 
unions free scope to develop, they took advantage of every 
opportunity to show the suspicion they felt’, Henceforward on Ly 
[rade Unions had a legal right to exist, but their members forming 
were in constant danger of overstepping the narrow limits Dnions was 
within which combined action was admissible®, But agreement 2/2; 
1 5 Geo. IV.c. 95§ 2. 
? It seems that the Committee hoped that the operation of the Common Law 
should be in future rendered more favourable to the workmen. * Your Com- 
mittee however in recommending that the common law should be restored are of 
opinion that an exception should be made to its operation, in favour of meetings 
and consultations amongst either masters or workmen, the object of which is 
peaceably to ‘consult upon’ the rate of wages to be either given or received, to 
agree to co-operate with each other in endeavouring to raise or lower it. and to 
settle the hours of labour; an exception, they trust, which, while it gives to those 
n the different classes of masters and workmen the ample means of maintaining 
sbeir respective interests, will not afford any support to the assumption of power 
or dictation in either party to the prejudice of the other, least of all that 
assumption of control on the part of the workmen in the conduct of any business 
or manufacture which is utterly incompatible with the necessary authority of the 
master, at whose risk and by whose capital it is to be carried on.” Report from 
the Select Committee on the Combination Laws (1825), 1v. 508. 
3 Wallas, op. cit. 238. Place evidently had no great confidence in this view, 
however. The nature of the difference between the two Acts may be rendered 
clear when we recall the fact that a recurrence of the printers’ prosecution and 
sentences in 1810, which would have been prohibited by the Act of 1824, was 
perfectly possible under the Act of 1825. See above, p. 757 n. 2. 
4 When, in August 1833, the Yorkshire manufacturers presented a memorial 
an the subject of * the Trades Union,” Lord Melbourne directed the answer to be 
returned that “he considers it unnecessary to repeat the strong opinion enter- 
tained by His Majesty's Ministers of the criminal character and the evil effects of 
the unions described in the Memorial,” adding that * no doubt can be entertained 
that combinations for the purposes enumerated are illegal conspiracies, and liable 
to be prosecuted as such at common law.” Webb, Trade Unionism, p. 127. 
8 «Although combination for the sole purpose of fixing hours or wages had 
reased to be illegal, it was possible to prosecute the workmen apon various other 
pretexts. Sometimes, a8 in the case of some Lancashire miners in 1832, the 
Trade Unionists were indicted for illegal combination for merely writing to their 
employers that a strike would take place. (R. v. Bykerdike, 1 Moo and Rob, 179, 
Lancaster Assizes, 1832. A letter was written to certain coal-owners, ‘by order
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Industrial Revolution. The University Press, 1922.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.