The Industrial Revolution

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1027928145

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487

Title:: The Industrial Revolution

Place of publication:: Cambridge

Publisher:: The University Press

Year of publication:: 1922

Scope:: xxii S., S. 404-886

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

DISTRESS OF HAND-LOOM WEAVERS 795 this trade was the more remarkable as linen weaving was AD exceedingly heavy work, in which women did not compete, i. The condition of the silk-weavers is not exactly and in the similar to that.of men engaged on other fabrics, as this had ** *% always been an exotic trade; from the time of the repeal of the protective legislation in 1824, they had been in great difficulties. Their business was not at all hard to learn, and this manufacture also was overcrowded, as linen-weaving was overcrowded, by men who had drifted into it from a similar calling. When the cloth manufacture migrated? from Essex and Suffolk and Norfolk to Yorkshire, the Eastern County weavers took up the silk trade®; but even in the best days they had to work at lower prices than the weavers in Spital- fields In this case they had suffered from every kind of competition ; that of women’s work, of those who picked up the trade hastily, of foreign weavers, and of the power-loom. There was violent resistance to the introduction of the power- loom at Coventry in 1831%; but the trade, as taken up and im- proved in Manchester and Macclesfield®, completely undersold the efforts of the Spitalfields and Eastern Counties weavers, among whom, apparently, the feeling against machinery was so strong that no one attempted to introduce it. In the a Pp 8 rate the power-loom ought to pay as much as the hand-loom weaver pays, and then we should have some chance of competing with them. Besides the many indirect taxes that we have to pay to the Government, we have other taxes of a still more grievous nature, and, it is said by many writers, of far greater amount. These taxes cut like a two-edged sword; it is not only the great amount that we have to pay, but at the same time it greatly injures our trade. This tax is what they call ¢ protecting duties’ fo the great landed property men of this country, not only the heavy duty on corn, but on every necessary of life, even to an egg.” Reports, 1840, xx111. 335. 1 Reports, 1840, xx. 191. ? The migration of the cloth manufacture from the Eastern Counties to York- shire received a considerable impetus during the long war. The flying shuttle and mill yarn were used in Yorkshire about 1800 (Reports, 1840, xx1r1. 417), and wages there were “comparatively high” (7%. 899), while all machinery appears to have been tabooed in the Eastern Counties (Ib. 147), unless in some newly introduced trades (7b. 175). The last remnants of the Eastern Counties’ cloth manufacture were the camlets which were made for the China market as long as the East India Company had the monopoly, but when the trade was thrown open in 1833 the Yorkshiremen undersold them in this article also (Reports, 1840, xxmr. 142). The West of England manufacture of serges suffered in a similar fashion (I3. 250). 3 Ib, 129. é Ib. 1235. 8 1b. 1833, xx. 899. 3 Ib. 1840, xx1v, 653.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: error

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation