The Industrial Revolution

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1027928145

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487

Title:: The Industrial Revolution

Place of publication:: Cambridge

Publisher:: The University Press

Year of publication:: 1922

Scope:: xxii S., S. 404-886

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

CONDITIONS OF WORK IN MINES 803 labour was not prejudicial to health in any obvious way, and 40, 1s young children were not employed at all. There was, however, another large and growing industry and « in which a strong case for State intervention was made out, wy 50 soon as the matter was investigated. The degradation of is 1 8 the mining population was not in any sense due to the intro- bia duction of machinery, and was only indirectly connected with the Industrial Revolution. The grievances, in so far as they affected adults, had been brought about by the increased development of capitalist organisation, and a change of system. It appears that in old days it had been the habit of the miners to undertake work in a particular seam, and that an element of speculation entered into the: terms they made. The basis on which wages were paid by the capitalist o£ u 0 ob 3 0 who exacted unwilling service. There were some remains of the system in Devonshire as late as 1843 (Reports, ete., 1843, x1. 59), but the worst evils had seen corrected in 1816 (56 Geo. ITI. ¢. 139). In the neighbourhood of Castle Acre, in Norfolk, a system of ‘ganging’ had grown up within very recent years. The parish of Castle Acre was held by several proprietors who did not attempt to limit the cottages; it thus came to be overcrowded with the surplus population of all the surrounding district. There was no sufficient employment for them in Castle Acre, and in many of the neigh. vouring parishes the farmers were short-handed, so that it was convenient to organise gangs; these worked in the fields under an overseer who had taken a contract for doing a certain piece of work. The gangs were often composed of shildren, and the overseer was a sweater; the system was thoroughly bad, but it appears to have been quite exceptional even in Norfolk, and nnknown elsewhere Reports, etc., 1843, x11. 237). There was also a special custom in Northumberland, where farm labour ippears to have been in great demand. The villages were so few and distant ‘hat cottages were built on each farm; the labourer was engaged for a year, and was bound to furnish the labour of a woman on the farm as well as his own. The system appears to have been advantageous in many ways to the labourer, but it was said that the houses provided were inferior to cottages which were rented in the usual way. Still there was little substantial grievance in the system, but the rame of the bondager roused sentimental obiections, of which Cobhett made 1imself the exponent. Certainly the Northumbrian labourers seem fo have been well off as com- pared with those in the southern counties. See especially the very complete iabourers’ budget. Ib. 318. 1 This was most obviously true of copper and lead mining, but appears to have aeld good of coal mining as well. Prebendary Gisborne wrote, * Hence there is » fundamental diversity between the gains of the miner and those of the husband- nan. The husbandman, in general, earns a fixed sum per week. If he sometimes adertakes task work, the amonnt of his earnings may still be foreseen with tolerable accuracy; and it has a known limit in the strength of his body and in his skill in this particular sort of work. But the pay of the miner depends upon 51 —9

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation