The Industrial Revolution

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1027928145

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-159926

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Cunningham, William http://d-nb.info/gnd/128907487

Title:: The Industrial Revolution

Place of publication:: Cambridge

Publisher:: The University Press

Year of publication:: 1922

Scope:: xxii S., S. 404-886

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

POSSIBLE SOURCES OF REVENUE 427 directly on that fund, rather than to cause disturbance to A.D. 1683 : _ ot —1776., prices by levying it on commodities’. But there were also objections of a political character; the excise was a branch and of revenue which had been assigned to the Crown; to touch Grounds. it in any way was difficult ; and to leave it in royal hands, and make it much more productive, would be to render the Crown less dependent on Parliament? Under the circumstances, it is not surprising that little was done to give effect to Davenant’s views; the taxes on malt’, and leather* imposed ander William III, were in accordance with his principles, and further steps were taken during the reign of Anne, in charging duties on candle-making, soap, painted calicoes and starch®; the Stamp Act, which was levied on newspapers and advertisements, may be placed in the same category. » tax upon land,” but held that * excises will affect land in no degree like taxes ‘hat charge it directly.”’ Ways and Means, in Works, 1. 77. 1 Sir Matthew Decker advocated a graduated tax on houses, as a means of ‘mposing an equable burden on all classes and raising a million annually which might be used for the discharge of the debt. Serious Considerations on the several High Duties, London, 1744, p. 17. This is undoubtedly Decker’s; the seventh (1756) edition bears his name, as well as the title-page of Horsley’s reply ‘Serious Considerations examined, 1744). A more ingenious proposal was put into shape in 1739 in an Essay on the Causes of the Decline of the Foreign Trade (1744), Brit. Mus. 8246. h, 1, which was attributed to Richardson. It is full of excellent eriticism on the then existing arrangements for taxation, and it proposes to replace all existing exactions, both local and national, by a single tax which should fall on averyone all round ; so far it coincides closely with the plan that was advocated by Sir Matthew Decker, but this new tax was not to be a tax on consumption but a tax that should be levied directly, by compelling everyone to take out a license for all sorts of articles of luxury which they might intend to use. The tract was reprinted more than once and appears to have attracted a good deal of attention. It is mentioned here as a curiosity in sumptuary proposals, and as an ingenious attempt to touch the pockets of the consumers directly with the least possible interference with trade, p. 44. Temple (Vindication of Commerce, p. 37) and Caldwell (Debates, 11. 782) attributed it to Decker, but the disregard of Decker’s own scheme, and the condemnation of the Navigation Acts, which Decker approved, render this most unlikely. Still more interesting is the proposal (Thoughts on the pernicious consequences of borrowing money, 1759) for substituting direct taxation on land and funded property, for the indirect taxes which hampered trade, and which. as Locke had argued. ultimately fell npon land. 3 The feeling is alluded to in general terms by Davenant, Ways and Means, 1. 76. William had the excise for life, but not the customs (Parl. Hist. v. 561), an arrangement which did not satisfy him. but which Bishop Burnet persuaded him Lo accept. 8 Dowell, Taxation, 11. 56. ¢ 8and 9 W. III. ¢. 21. & Dowell, 11. 76,

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation