Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Unemployment in the United States

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Unemployment in the United States

Monograph

Identifikator:
1028407564
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-47263
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Link, Henry Charles
Thorndike, Edward L. http://d-nb.info/gnd/118802127
Title:
Employment psychology
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
MacMillan
Year of publication:
1924
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (XII, 440 Seiten)
Digitisation:
2018
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part I. Psychological tests
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Unemployment in the United States
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, a senator from the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. Henry A. Atikinson, general secretary Church Union and World Alliance, New York City
  • Statement of Mr. William Green, president of American Federation of Labor
  • Statement of Dr. Samuel Joseph, College of the City of New York
  • Statement by Miss Frances Perkins, industrial commissioner of the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. William T. Foster
  • Statement of Prof. Paul Douglas, of Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa.
  • Statement of John B. Andrews, Director of the American Association for Labor Legislation
  • Statement of James A. Emery, Washtington, D.C., representing the National Association of Manufacturers, and others
  • Statement of Mrs. E. E. Danley, representing the National Board of the Young Women´s Christian Association
  • Statement of James A. Emery, representing National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America
  • Statement of Thomas F. Cadwalader, representing the Sentinels of the Republic, Baltimore, MD.
  • Statement of Miss Grace E. Cooke, representing the National Employment Board, Boston, Mass
  • Statement of Fred J. Winslow, Chicago, Ill., representing the Illinois Employment Board
  • Statement of Frank L. Peckham
  • Statement of James M. Mead, of New York
  • Closing statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, United States Senator from the States of Yew York
  • Statement of hon. John L. Cable, a representative in congress from the State of Ohio

Full text

[ 17] 
Nationalists support Home Rule, Unionists denounce 
it, but all Irishmen unite in opposing the dismem- 
berment of Ireland. Once convince the Ulster 
Unionists that Home Rule is inevitable, and they 
will accept the inclusion of Ulster as the lesser of 
two evils. 
It is not hard to show that the policy of exclusion 
was never supported on its merits by any section of 
Irishmen. The real issue between Irish Nationalists 
and Unionists was, Home Rule or no Home Rule for 
a united Ireland. For more than a century the 
battle was fought on this issue by O’Connell, Butt, 
Parnell, McCarthy, and Redmond. Home Rule was 
denounced by the Unionists as “treason,” “rebellion,” 
and “dismemberment of the Empire” It was ap- 
plauded by the Nationalists as the liberation and 
regeneration of Ireland ; but through all those years 
there was never a hint from any party that the solu- 
tion of the question could be found in the dismem- 
berment of Ireland. 
In the strenuous second reading debate in 1886, . 
when Mr. Gladstone first raised the question, Home 
Rule for all Ireland was the only issue before Parlia- 
ment. In 1893 I was present every day in the 
House when Home Rule was discussed, week after 
week, month after month, on second reading, com- 
mittee, and report, and I never heard from any 
quarter the faintest suggestion that any part of Ire- 
land should be excluded from the jurisdiction of the 
Irish Parliament. 
During the fierce agitation in Ulster in the autumn 
of 1912 there was never a hint of exclusion. The 
famous Covenant, so enthusiastically adopted, so 
universally signed by the Unionists of Ulster, was in 
effect a repudiation of the policy of exclusion. It is 
important for the right understanding of the present 
Irish situation to recall the pledge of mutual support 
contained in the Covenant :—
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Ulster’s Opportunity. Unwin, 1917.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.