Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
  • enterFullscreen
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Comparison of rates of duty in the Tariff Act of 1930 and in the Tariff Act of 1922

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

Metadata: Comparison of rates of duty in the Tariff Act of 1930 and in the Tariff Act of 1922

Monograph

Identifikator:
1028803753
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-47137
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Die hygienischen Verhältnisse der Insel Formosa
Place of publication:
Dresden
Publisher:
[Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
Year of publication:
1911
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (IV, 232 Seiten)
Digitisation:
2018
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
14. Nahrungsmittelkontrolle
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Comparison of rates of duty in the Tariff Act of 1930 and in the Tariff Act of 1922
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part I. Comparison by items, so far as import statistics are available, by paragraphs, and by schedules, of the rates of duty under the tariff act of 1922 and the tariff act of 1930
  • Part II. Analysis of changes in the act of 1930 as compared with the act of 1922
  • Part III. Comparison of the equivalent rates of duty in the tariff act of 1922 and the tariff act of 1930, by groups of commodities arranged according to the statistical classification followed by the Derpartment of Commerce in its annual publications of imports for consumption
  • Index to part I.

Full text

ok 
SCHEDULE 10.—FLAX, HEMP, JUTE, AND MANUFACTURES OF—Continued 
Comparison of rates of duty in the tariff act of 1922 and the tariff act of 1930— Continued 
Paragraph 
ct of Act of 
1922 | 1930 
1022] 1001 
w22 | 1001 
1022 | 1021 ' 
1022 | 1021 
10 | 1022 
1023 | 1022 
1021 023 
1021 1023 
i021 1023 
1021 1023 
021 1023 
Imports, calendar year 1928 
Actual or com- 
puted ad valo- 
rem rate 
Commodity 
Unit of 
juantity 
Computed duties on 
1928 imports 
Rate of dutv 
Quantity | Vv alug 
y Value per unit ' Act of 1922 Act of 1930 
Actof | Act of 
1922 1930 
re cent! Per cent 
1, 528, 951 $181,181 | $0. 119 $45, 869 $45,869 | 3 cents per square FTAemmeeaeen 3 cents per square yard....._....__| 25.32 | 2532 
690, 874 | 546, 208 L791 191,173 191, 173 | 35 per CODY eemeemceceaceenene] 35 per Ont meoeeomeoameee 35.00 | 35.00 
20) 10, 746 .331 3,761 3,761 ede 35.00 35.00 
3,447, 688 } 786, 828 .228 | 314,731 314,731 | 40 percent... ...ceeceeneeauaa...l d0pereent.. ooooo_eeeee-... 40.00 40.00 
5, 699, 963 | 1, 524, 963 | rmmemenee 555, 534 ! B00, 034 [nnuvumersn imitans SAR SARE] BERR demi mane OE | 36.13 
4,628,792 BB 470,148 102 | 277,722 | 370,296 | 6 cents per square foot. .....____..| 8 cents per square foot_........__.' 50.07 | 78.76 
177.786 59, 674 . 336 14, 223 17,779 | 8 cents per square yard._.........._..| 10 cents per square yard____._. 23.83 29.79 
520,822 |_cooooee| 201,045 | 888,075 |oeooioeeeooeeeeecocmeeeccmeeenocleii eee 55.10 | 73.25 
“loor coverings other than wool: 
Straw matting and floor covering made | Sq. yard. | 
therefrom. 
Floor coverings of cotton (to paragraph 921) i 
“ute carpets, carpetings, mats, matting, do_____.. 
Or rugs. ’ 
Carpets, carpetings, mats, matting, and _do....... 
rugs, of flax or hemp or a mixture thereof. 
Floor coverings, 0.8. P. foo cmiecmecneene GO _ion 
Total, pagiapheecueceansnuncanonsmn  sNsesausss 
‘Lats of cocoa fiber or rattan. _.__.___.____.__.._." 3q.feet__.| 
datting of cocoa fiber or rattan. ............... "7 vard. 
Total, paragraph. coco. 
Tanufactures of vegetable fiber (other than ' 
notton) n.s. p. f.; 
Manufactures of flax n. s. p. fo _.__..__....| ~cTQU..... 
Manufactures of hemp n. 8. Pu fomeoooooooo]acl’ cea]. 
Manufactures of jute n. 8. p. foo cimiecei oan ceaeaooll 
vianufactures of ramie n. 8. p. foo Lo foo 0 cea fans 
Jdanufactures of vegetable fiber (other than |.__do_____ 
ax, hemp, jute, ramie, or cotton) n. s. p. f. 
‘Total, paragraph... ___..........___. A 
Total. Schedule 10 _ __ 
LO 
139 fee 
18 | 40 per ant. . cccavrnmsrsmme manne] DOP OOD. ous mmm mn mmm 
1 can s@0i iv insman mms Amen nmr sas runre QB vs dae NE SE RE AIRS 
veee-don.. Snir ghd sheet bine rey mmm mmm Wy SH 
Ceemen€Oniin le eon eee eld a 
+ Ar do 
40.00 | 40.00 
10.00] 40.00 
10.00 | 40.00 
£0.00 40.00 
40.00 | 40.00 
40.00 | 40.00 
18.16. 19.14 
Minimum rate. 
» Maximum rate. . 
3 The phrascology of this paragraph has been changed to provide for certain linens at 55 per cent ad valorem by transfer from paragraphs 1010 and 1011, the rates of which are 40 per cent ad valorem and 35 per cent ad valorem, 
spain. Import statistics are not segregated for a recomputation. 
ee footnote 6. 
I 5 Changes in phraseology increasing the thread count limitation per square inch from 110 to 120 transfers paddings and interlinings of flax or hemp from paragraph 1010 to 1009b. Valueestimated at $200,000. Duties calculated on 
hanged values. LL. 
¢ Includes imports of artists’ canvas, which has been transferred to paragraph 1009 at 55 per cent ad valorem. Import statistics not being segregated for application of these rates the 40 per cent rate under the old paragraph has 
seen used. 
7 Includes paddings exceeding 110 but not exceeding 120 threads to square inch. Imports not segregated, therefore can not apply rate of 55 per cent. 
8 Changes in phraseology reduces the weight limitation from 434 to 4 ounces per square yard and increases the width limitation from 24 to 36 inches and transfers fabrics from paragraph 1011 to paragraph 1010. Values estimated 
it $2,000,000. Duties calculated on changed values. . oo. . 
9 Provided that any of the handkerchiefs made with hand-rolled or hand-made hems shall be subiect to an additional dutv of 1 cent each. Immnort statistics are not seererated and it is estimated that 25 per cent (848 515 dozen) 
vnr1ld be subinct to the additional dntv
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Comparison of Rates of Duty in the Tariff Act of 1930 and in the Tariff Act of 1922. Government Printing Office, 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.