Forstwirtschafts-Politik

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1690009462

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-101382

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Weber, Heinrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/11716383X

Title:: Forstwirtschafts-Politik

Place of publication:: Neudamm

Publisher:: Neumann

Year of publication:: 1926

Scope:: X, 324 S; Taf

Digitisation:: 2020

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Erster vorbereitender Teil. Die deutsche Forst- und Holzwirtschaft der Gegenwart

Collection:: Economics Books

[492 IMPERIAL UNITY [PART VIII receive full recognition in this manner. But at the time Sir H. Campbell-Bannerman was unwilling to accept the proposal and of necessity the project dropped. It had not been revived by any other Dominion, and the resolution as to the constitution of the Colonial Office proposed by Sir Joseph Ward was expressly opposed to the separation of the office at all, for it contemplated merely that the Secretary of State should receive a new title, namely the Secretary of State for Imperial Affairs, and that two permanent Under- Secretaries of State should be created. Of the other resolutions the most important were those (Nos. 3 and 4) which suggested that if any naval contribution was given by a Dominion to the Imperial Government it should be permitted to deduct from the amount of that contribution any sums which it might expend in connexion with naval defence or the creation of naval bases, and that in place of the existing preferences granted by the Dominions, there should be substituted a system of contribution to Imperial naval and local defence. Naturally in this form the last resolution was hardly likely to be acceptable to the Imperial Government. Canada and Australia had definitely recognized responsibility in part at least for their own naval defence, and were creating navies with that end in view, while New Zealand had preferred to make a direct contribu- tion towards the cost of the navy. But in either case there had been no disposition to suggest that the existing pre- ferences should be modified or reduced, and the adoption of the proposal would have been purely disadvantageous to the Imperial Government. The whole proposal was no doubt to be explained by the domestic circumstances of the Union. A direct payment was made by the Cape and Natal towards the cost of the navy, and the Union Government presumably wished to charge against that sum the amounts which it expended in local naval defence on land, and in this form the proposal was obviously reasonable, but to sacrifice for any naval contribu- tion the benefits of the British preference would have been most unfortunate, and the Union Government later with-

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation