Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Procedures in employment psychology

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Procedures in employment psychology

Monograph

Identifikator:
173623112X
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-112923
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Bingham, Walter Van Dyke http://d-nb.info/gnd/123042593
Freyd, Max
Title:
Procedures in employment psychology
Place of publication:
Chicago & New York
Publisher:
Shaw
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
XI, 269 S
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
IX. Rating scales
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Procedures in employment psychology
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • I. The problem of selection of employees
  • II. Job analysis
  • III. Criteria of vocational success
  • IV. Choice of workers to be studied
  • V. Analysis of the worker
  • VI. Selection of examinations
  • VII. Psychological tests
  • VIII. Psychological tests (concluded)
  • IX. Rating scales
  • X. Rating scales (concluded)
  • XI. Questionnaires: The personal history record and the interest analysis
  • XII. Test administration
  • XIII. Validation of the measuring instruments
  • XIV. Validation of the measuring instruments (concluded)
  • XV. Prediction of vocational success
  • XVI. Prediction of vocational success (concluded)
  • XVII. Prediction by combined scores
  • XVIII. Economic value of the examintions
  • XIX. The examinations at work
  • Index

Full text

EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY 
of the rater in preparing his master scales. Raters differ 
considerably among themselves in judging men by this 
method. Some of them tend to ignore the key men entirely 
in making their ratings and fall back upon their general 
conceptions of excellence in the ability in question. For an 
excellent critical analysis of this form of rating scale, see 
Rugg (156). 
The scale of alternatives or two steps. The judgment is 
given in the form of a Yes or No answer to the question: 
“Does the man possess this ability?” The difficulty with this 
simple method is that most abilities are not distributed in 
this all-or-none way. Abilities more often are found to be 
distributed among people in general in accordance with the 
normal probability curve. In other words, most people have 
neither a very small amount nor a very large amount of an 
ability. The judge finds himself unable to make satisfac- 
tory or accurate decisions regarding these people who do not 
deviate greatly from the average in this ability. 
Per cent scales. The judge rates each man in terms of per 
cents much as he would mark an examination paper, on the 
assumption: that 100% is the maximum amount of the 
ability that any man can possess. This implies a finer dis- 
crimination than is possible or desirable. Moreover, two 
raters can rarely be found who agree on how much 100% 
of the ability is, or 80%, or 50%. They really use different 
measuring sticks. 
Per cent scales sometimes require the judge to estimate 
the per cent of the general population which in his opinion 
this man would excel in the ability. 
Multiple-step scales. The judge indicates his estimate of 
the amount of the ability each man possesses by checking 
one of a series of symbols. In the following scales, a plus 
sign indicates a high degree of the ability in question and 
a minus sign a deficiency in the ability. The meaning of the 
other symbols is obvious. 
126
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Procedures in Employment Psychology. Shaw, 1926.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.