Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Procedures in employment psychology

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Procedures in employment psychology

Monograph

Identifikator:
173623112X
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-112923
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Bingham, Walter Van Dyke http://d-nb.info/gnd/123042593
Freyd, Max
Title:
Procedures in employment psychology
Place of publication:
Chicago & New York
Publisher:
Shaw
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
XI, 269 S
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
XVII. Prediction by combined scores
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Procedures in employment psychology
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • I. The problem of selection of employees
  • II. Job analysis
  • III. Criteria of vocational success
  • IV. Choice of workers to be studied
  • V. Analysis of the worker
  • VI. Selection of examinations
  • VII. Psychological tests
  • VIII. Psychological tests (concluded)
  • IX. Rating scales
  • X. Rating scales (concluded)
  • XI. Questionnaires: The personal history record and the interest analysis
  • XII. Test administration
  • XIII. Validation of the measuring instruments
  • XIV. Validation of the measuring instruments (concluded)
  • XV. Prediction of vocational success
  • XVI. Prediction of vocational success (concluded)
  • XVII. Prediction by combined scores
  • XVIII. Economic value of the examintions
  • XIX. The examinations at work
  • Index

Full text

PREDICTION BY COMBINED SCORES 2 
scores. Another point not to be overlooked is the relative 
dispersion of scores in the two tests. The test with the 
greater standard deviation receives more weight when raw 
scores are added even though the range of scores in the two 
tests is the same. The method of adding raw scores should 
then ordinarily be avoided. 
Error due to unintentional weighting of the first sort men- 
tioned in the preceding paragraph may be eliminated by 
weighting to equalize the medians or means in the various 
tests. If the median score in one test is five times as great 
as the median score in another test, then scores in the second 
test should be multiplied by five. This method, however, 
does not take into account the relative dispersion of scores 
in the two tests. To do this the scores in each test should 
be expressed in terms of the standard deviation of scores 
in that test. This step reduces to the same unit of measure- 
ment the scores in the different tests. To express any per- 
son’s score in a test in terms of the standard deviation, the 
deviation of his score from the mean of the distribution is 
divided by the standard deviation of the distribution, and 
a plus or minus sign affixed, depending on whether his score 
is above or below the mean. (If the test has a negative cor- 
relation with the criterion, then a plus sign is affixed before 
a score which is below the mean, and vice versa.) The 
probable error of the distribution should be used as the unit 
measure of dispersion, if the median instead of the mean 
has been calculated. The individual’s total score is the 
algebraic sum of his scores in each of the separate tests, as 
thus computed. 
Adding percentile standings in the various tests equalizes 
the weights. So, too, when decile or quintile standings are 
added. A total score so obtained must be considered as a 
measure of relative standing only. 
The above methods assign equal weight to the various 
tests. Once the matter of unintentional weighting has been 
guarded against in this way, the proper weight to be given to 
each test may be determined. This weight will depend both 
20%
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Procedures in Employment Psychology. Shaw, 1926.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.