Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Monograph

Identifikator:
1740277147
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-132094
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
XII, 394 S.
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter VIII. The approved society system
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. Introduction
  • Chapter II. The scheme of national health insurance
  • Chapter III. The general attitude to the health insurance scheme
  • Chapter IV. The related schemes of social welfare
  • Chapter V. The development of the health services
  • Chapter VI. The financial burden of the existing social services
  • Chapter VII. The financial resources of health insurance scheme
  • Chapter VIII. The approved society system
  • Chapter IX. Inequalities of benefit in different approved societies
  • Chapter X. Proposals for extending medical benefit
  • Chapter XI. Proposal for dependants' allowances
  • Chapter XII. Consideration of certain major problems
  • Chapter XIII. Miscellaneous questions
  • Chapter XIV. Summary of conclusions and recommendations
  • Reservation by Sir Andrew Duncan and Professor Alexander Gray
  • Minority report

Full text

34 
MAJORITY REPORT. 
and branches does not show to disadvantage. Tn this connexion 
we may refer to the evidence of Sir Walter Kinnear in reply to 
Q. 748-746. 
207. Closely allied to the criticism that the Approved Society 
system is unduly costly in administration—indeed one of the 
causes for this alleged expensiveness—is the overlapping of effort 
for which Societies are frequently condemned arising by reason 
of the fact that Approved Societies may carry on business in 
any part of the country. In any moderate-sized town the insured 
persons may be scattered amongst some hundreds of Societies 
and branches, each of which has to make arrangements for the 
administration of the cash benefits to members entitled to them. 
For example, we were informed that in Liverpool 488 Societies 
have members—in Bolton 285, in Brighton 304, in Norwich o13, 
in Reading 245, and in Tynemouth 168 (Kinnear, Q. 522). 
208. Again, Mr. Alban Gordon says (App. XIII, 7): ““ If any 
area is analysed it will be found to contain a large number of 
Societies possessing a ludicrously small membership in that dis- 
trict. For example, in Dundee (which is an illustration chosen at 
random) there are 217 separate Societies (ignoring branches), of 
which 99 have less than 10 members in the town, 52 of these 
having only one member. These Societies have their Head Offices 
at London, Manchester, Glasgow, Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Leeds, 
Portsmouth, Newcastle, Tunbridge Wells, etc.”’ 
209. The Scottish Miners’ Federation Approved Society, in 
referring to the fact that there are 98 Societies, each with only 
one meniber resident in Glasgow, say that ** were the Glasgow 
area treated as a single unit in preference to having approved 
units studded all over like a cluster of nebula it would be possible 
to administer the area at an enormous economic saving to the 
mmsured population *’ (App. X, 18). It should be remembered 
in connexion with this allegation of overlapping and diffusion of 
effort that even where a Society may initially recruit members 
only within a limited area, these members may later become 
scattered ; further, that in the case of any household comprising 
several insured persons, each of these may be in a different 
Society, and that the home may therefore require to he visited 
by the representatives of a number of competing organisations. 
Indeed in the extreme case represented by the National Amulga- 
mated Approved Society, members of the same family, although 
in the same Society, may be visited by different agents, if their 
membership in the National Amalgamated Approved Society has 
been effected through the representatives of different companies 
interested in that organisation. The fact that the Scheme is 
not organised on a geographical basis adds undoubtedly to the 
labour involved in the administration of medical benefit, which 
must necessarily be conducted on a territorial basis. As the 
contributions on which the title to medical benefit depends are
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance. Stationery Office, 1926.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.