Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Monograph

Identifikator:
1740277147
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-132094
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
XII, 394 S.
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter IX. Inequalities of benefit in different approved societies
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. Introduction
  • Chapter II. The scheme of national health insurance
  • Chapter III. The general attitude to the health insurance scheme
  • Chapter IV. The related schemes of social welfare
  • Chapter V. The development of the health services
  • Chapter VI. The financial burden of the existing social services
  • Chapter VII. The financial resources of health insurance scheme
  • Chapter VIII. The approved society system
  • Chapter IX. Inequalities of benefit in different approved societies
  • Chapter X. Proposals for extending medical benefit
  • Chapter XI. Proposal for dependants' allowances
  • Chapter XII. Consideration of certain major problems
  • Chapter XIII. Miscellaneous questions
  • Chapter XIV. Summary of conclusions and recommendations
  • Reservation by Sir Andrew Duncan and Professor Alexander Gray
  • Minority report

Full text

bem, 
ular 
sent 
hich 
y be 
vide 
sible 
Iz, 
very 
iety 
less 
nore 
can 
the 
for 
sub- 
and 
ould 
3 on 
of 
first 
ary 
ped 
arge 
arly 
per 
righ 
and 
that 
ATT - 
1ave 
rom 
pro- 
the 
ties 
For 
the 
sur- 
are 
ther 
or a 
the 
ibu- 
Was 
MAJORITY REPGRT. 
119 
pointed out that by grouping themselves in special Societies 
agricultural workers would be able substantially to attain the 
same ends, as they would thereby reap the advantages of their 
light sickness experience in additional benefits which might 
take the form of return of contributions. It is perhaps worthy 
of notice that the claims of the agricultural population to be 
conceded a reduced rate of contribution have again been put 
forward. Thus, the National Farmers’ Union of Scotland con- 
tend (App. LXXI; Q. 19,172-19,399) that the rate of con- 
tribution is, in the case of agricultural workers, more than 
sufficient to meet the cost of the benefits of that class, and that 
a variable rate of contribution based on sickness risks should be 
instituted. They point out that in the case of Societies consisting 
preponderantly of members residing in urban districts the 
contribution is only sufficient to support the normal benefits, 
whereas purely agricultural Societies show large surpluses. They 
state that ‘‘ Agriculture is a healthy industry and stands apart 
from all other industries in this country. In all other respects it 
is treated separately. For instance, it is not included under the 
Unemployment Insurance Scheme, nor is it included in any pro- 
jected legislation in regard to limitation of working hours. If 
makes a distinet claim for separate treatment in this connexion ’. 
They go on to urge that *“ in regard to agricultural workers there 
should be a reduction all round in the contributions payable.”’ 
The National Council of Agriculture for England state (App. 
LXXXV, 5; Q. 21196-21217) that the agricultural worker on the 
average receives a low rate of wages, and is probably content to 
receive a low wage partly because his occupation is a healthy one. 
They contend that persons in more arduous and more hazardous 
Occupations receive higher rates of wages and should ““ with that 
high wage pay more for their Health Insurance than the agri- 
cultural worker.’ 
254. Another justification for differentiation in benefits lies in 
the incentive which is thereby offered to good and careful adminis- 
tration. We think that it would be fatal both administratively 
and financially if the persons charged with the responsibility for 
considering claims for benefit felt that there was nothing to be 
gained by doing their work well and thoroughly. 
SOHBME TO MITIGATE INEQUALITIES OF BENEFIT. 
255. While we cannot support the proposal for differential 
contributions, we have come to the conclusion that the possi- 
bility of the existence of differences in the rate of benefits provided 
by different Societies should continue to be a feature of the scheme 
of National Health Insurance. We believe, moreover, that the 
inequalities which have in fact been disclosed are only such as 
could have been and were foreseen in 1911 by those whose 
technical knowledge and experience enabled them to gauge the 
probabilities. It is true that as a result of the War the actual 
34.709 
lo» 
=n
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Der Safranhandel Im Mittelalter. P. Hauptmann’sche Buchdruckerei, 1914.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.