Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Monograph

Identifikator:
1740277147
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-132094
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
XII, 394 S.
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. Introduction
  • Chapter II. The scheme of national health insurance
  • Chapter III. The general attitude to the health insurance scheme
  • Chapter IV. The related schemes of social welfare
  • Chapter V. The development of the health services
  • Chapter VI. The financial burden of the existing social services
  • Chapter VII. The financial resources of health insurance scheme
  • Chapter VIII. The approved society system
  • Chapter IX. Inequalities of benefit in different approved societies
  • Chapter X. Proposals for extending medical benefit
  • Chapter XI. Proposal for dependants' allowances
  • Chapter XII. Consideration of certain major problems
  • Chapter XIII. Miscellaneous questions
  • Chapter XIV. Summary of conclusions and recommendations
  • Reservation by Sir Andrew Duncan and Professor Alexander Gray
  • Minority report

Full text

344 
APPENDIX A. 
in the same society with a common Contingencies Fund, and having 
regard to the relative risks of excess in the sickness and disablement 
claims of the sexes we can see no justification for requiring, in the case 
of women, a smaller contribution for the purpose of these funds than that 
called for in the case of men. The effect of this recommendation will be 
to release from each weekly contribution for the new purposes ‘81d. for 
a man and 15d. for a woman. 
98. Two consequential changes in the present system follow on this 
recommendation. The first of these relates to the Central Fund. The 
limit on the sum to be transferred to this fund under the existing statute 
is one-eighth of the contributions credited to the Contingencies Funds. It 
is important that the maximum charge upon the resources of the Approved 
Societies for the support of the Central Fund should not be sensibly 
reduced, and, since we advise a reduction of rather more than one-half in 
the sums to be transferred to the Contingencies Funds, we recommend that 
one-fourth instead of one-eighth of these sums be made available as the 
maximum draft for the Central Fund. 
An analogous adjustment is advised in respect of the pooling provisions 
of the Act with reference to the Contingencies Funds of the unassociated 
societies with under one thousand members. At present one-half of these 
funds is liable to be pooled for the purpose of making good the deficiencies 
of societies in this category, the other half being reserved for the use of the 
societies individually. Since our recommendation will so largely reduce the 
Contingencies Funds, we advise that the whole, instead of one-half in the 
case of the societies in question, be brought under the liability to be pooled. 
99. The margin for other purposes (to use the words of our terms of 
reference) which, in our opinion, may be taken from the present contribu- 
tion—subject, in the case of women, to the qualifications expressed in 
para. 20 above—is obtained by bringing together the margins in the 
several parts of the contribution as stated in paras. 25, 26 and 27. The 
combined amounts are 1'55d. per week in the case of men and ‘82d. per week 
in the case of women. 
These amounts are made up as follows: — 
From the Benefit Fund contribution (para. 25) ... 
From the contribution retained for the service of 
Reserve Values (para. 26) ny a ah 
From the Contingencies Fund contribution 
(para. 27) ia ia ria sie vee Sue 
Total 
1:54; 
‘Women. 
d. 
‘35 
*39 
13 
“89 
30. These figures constitute the answer to the question submitted to us, 
but, since the contribution of which in each case they form a part is pay- 
able only until the age of 656 and is intermitted in weeks of sickness and 
disablement and of unemployment, it remains to be considered for whav 
expenditure the margin will provide in the case of insured persons of each 
sex. This question admits of a variety of answers according to the nature 
of the purposes involving new expenditure which may be contemplated. 1t 
is nob within our province to anticipate the questions which may arise in 
this connection, but, having regard to the number of possibilities involving 
the provision of a capitation rate continuing during life which present 
themselves on examination of the evidence taken by the Royal Commission, 
we have deemed it advisable to examine the margin from this point of 
view. We find that with the State grant added it would provide an annual 
amount of 7s. for a man and 3s. 9d. for a woman, to continue during life 
or otherwise so long as medical benefit is provided. If the new expendi- 
ture took this form some addition to the reserve values would be necessary,
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance. Stationery Office, 1926.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.