Valuation, depreciation and the rate base

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 174667931X

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-119897

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Grunsky, Carl Ewald http://d-nb.info/gnd/10180959X

Title:: Valuation, depreciation and the rate base

Edition:: 2. ed., revised and extended

Place of publication:: New York

Publisher:: Wiley

Year of publication:: 1927

Scope:: X, 500 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Index

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Index

Title:: Index

Collection:: Economics Books

x 2 429 Cooley, Prof. M. E., overhead expenses, | Court Cases Cited, Minn. St. Paul and 53, 35 Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. us. Cooperation between owner and public, Wisconsin R. R. Commission, 150. 148. Copper production in the United States, Minnesota Rate cases, 18, 76, 135, Table 15, 258, 250. 199, 205. Cost, base physical, discussed by Wis- Murray vs. Public Utilities, 137. consin Railroad Commission, 158. National Water-works Co. vs. Kansas determination of, 39. City, 60, 64. records used in rate-base, 193. New York & Queens County Gas Cost of article includes overhead ex- Co. Rate Case, 310. penses, 42. Reagan vs. Farmer Loan and Trust Cost of establishing the business, defini- Co., 73. tion, 26, 32. San Diego Land and Town Co. vs. treated as legitimate investment, 30. National City, 18. Cost of operation, determination of, San Diego Land and Town Co. vs. 125. Geo. Neale et al, 198. Cost of physical elements, determina- Shoemaker vs. United States, 198. tion of, 38. Smyth vs. Ames, 18. related to value, 309. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. Cost of replacement, definition, 23. Rate case, 315. related to present worth, go. United States vs. Chandler Dunbar Cost of reproduction, appreciation in- Water Power Co., 108. cluded, 76. United States vs. Honolulu Planta- definition, 29. tion Co., 199. in relation to investment, 77. Willcox vs. Consolidated Gas Co. of is not value, 136. New York, 19, 71, 73. use in rate-base, 193. Young vs. Harrison, 198. Courts and the rate-base, 15. Croton dam, change in plans for, 51. Court cases cited, Boom Company vs. Curle,J. H.,on mining investments, 243. Patterson, 197. Current depreciation (see Depreciation). Atlanta Rate case, 316. Current replacement requirement, def- Bluefield Rate case, 316. inition (see Replacement), 24. Consolidated Gas case, New York (see Willcox, etc.), 19, 71, 73. . Galveston Rate case, 314. ! Georgia Ry. & P. Co. Rate case, 316. Days of the year, number of each day, Goodwin vs. Cincinnati & Whitewater 328. Canal Co., 198. Deferred maintenance, definition, 24. Interstate Commerce Commission vs. determination of, 125. B. & O. R. R. Co, 145. in an operating plant, 79. Kansas City Water-works case, 60, 64. Definitions subject to modification, 5. Kennebec Water District vs. City of Denny, G. A., rate of interest on mining Waterville et al, 17, 29, 63, 66, investments, 244. 72, 154, 160. Depreciation, account, explained by Knoxville vs. Knoxville Water Co., Interstate Commerce Commis- 134, 154. sion, 230. \NDEX a [3

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Valuation, depreciation and the rate base

Monograph

Index

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Index

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation