Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

National banking under the Federal Reserve System

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: National banking under the Federal Reserve System

Monograph

Identifikator:
1757542345
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-135097
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
National banking under the Federal Reserve System
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
The National City Bank of New York
Year of publication:
1927
Scope:
154 S.
Digitisation:
2021
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Acceptance by member banks of drafts and bills of exchange
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • National banking under the Federal Reserve System
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • New York correspondent
  • Growth of the national banking system
  • National bank organization
  • Succession of a state bank by a national bank
  • Circulation
  • Changes in capital
  • Liquidation
  • Consolidation
  • Corporate existence
  • Name and location
  • Shareholders
  • Dividends
  • Investments
  • Interest
  • Paper eligible for rediscount and purchase by federal reserve banks
  • Acceptance by member banks of drafts and bills of exchange
  • Reserve requirements
  • Check clearing and collection
  • Interlocking bank directorates under the clayton act
  • Banks as insurance agents
  • Banks as agents and brokers for real estate loans
  • Power to hold real property
  • Report of condition
  • Trust department
  • Branches
  • Federal reserve act (approved Dec.23,1913)
  • Index

Full text

LAISSEZ FAIRE 
and to a lowering of the status of the workmen. Petitions 
in support of this opinion poured in from all parts of the 
and despite country, and all sorts of trades’. But a mere mass of evidence 
the evi- . yo z . . 
the «vi. had no chance of producing conviction in minds which were 
fase thoroughly imbued with a belief in the all-sufficiency of eco- 
» pomic principles. Mr Sergeant Onslow urged the repeal of 
the Act, and remarked that “the reign of Elizabeth, though 
glorious, was not one in which sound principles of commerce 
were known” Mr Phillips, the member for Ilchester, was 
still more decided. * The true principles of commerce,” he 
said, “ appeared at that time to be misunderstood, and the Act 
in question proved the truth of this assertion. The persons 
most competent to form regulations with respect to trade 
were the master manufacturers, whose interest it was to have 
goods of the best fabric, and no legislative enactment could 
ever effect so much in producing that result as the merely 
leaving things to their own courses and operation®.” 
On this subject the politicians were only giving effect to the 
conclusions of economists of repute. Chalmers had been brief, 
but to the point. «This law, as far as it requires apprentice- 
ships, ought to be repealed, because its tendency is to abridge 
the liberty of the subject, and to prevent competition among 
workmen” Adam Smith, with his experience of the laxer 
Scottish usage, had condemned the English system®, and it 
may be doubted if any of his followers, at the beginning of 
this century, would have dissented from his conclusion on this 
point. Once again laissez faire, pure and simple, triumphed 
through the influence of, and with the approval of economists, 
and the apprenticeship system was not modified, but swept 
away in 1814¢. It thus came about that the whole Elizabethan 
labour code, both as regards wages and apprentices, was for- 
mally abolished. We may notice, however, that whereas the 
wages clauses had been regarded as a mere dead letter, the 
House of Commons believed that apprenticeship was in most 
cases an exceedingly good thing, and that it was already so 
360 
1 It appears that there were 300,000 signatures against, and 2000 in favour of 
repeal. Parl. Debates, XXV1L. 574. 
3 Parl. Debates, Xvi 564, see also 881. 8 Tb. 572. 
t Chalmers, Estimate, p. 86. 8 Wealth of Nations, p. 50. 
3 54 Geo. III. c. 96.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Industrial Revolution. The University Press, 1922.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.